0
Volcanoes are much more dangerous. Quicksand is dangerous, yes, but relatively easy to overcome by several methods. Stories of people stepping into quicksand and rapidly sinking out of sight are very frequently "elaborated".
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between a sinkhole and quicksand?
a sinkhole is a hole and quicksand is just wet sand
What is difference between a sinkhole and quicksand?
a sinkhole is a hole and quicksand is just wet sand
Is there quicksand in Sahara?
no
Is quicksand a land form?
No.
What does Quicksand do to the environment?
Nothing it just exists! quicksand is just over saturated soil and/or clay, you might as well say what does mud/muck do to the environment.
Is dry quicksand dangerous?
Yes, dry quicksand is dangerous.
Why is quicksand dangerous?
Quicksand is dangerous because it can be difficult to get out of. However, unlike in the movies, it is possible to get out of quicksand if you remain calm and use your head.
Is Quicksand Dangerous?
yes. you cant breath under it. you will die if you are all the way in the quicksand.
Are earthquakes more dangerous than a volcano?
no both are equal
Is a snow volcano dangerous?
yes all volcano's are dangerous ?
How dangerous is quicksand?
Quicksand is dangerous because you can't escape from it by moving around like crazy. By doing that, you'll sink quicker 'till the point it engulf you alive. The only way to escape is to get a stable vine to pull you out.
Is a cinder cone or a composite volcano more dangerous?
Composite Cone
Which volcano hazard can be dangerous to passing sir planes due to its fine, abrasive quality?
Volcano ash hazard can be dangerous.
What are the names of the most dangerous volcano?
a active volcano
Which is more likely to be dangerous a volcano that erupts frequently a volcano that has been inactive for a hundred years?
a volcano that hasn't been active for a hundred years because of viscosity which is the resistance to flow and one that has been inactive for a hundred years would have a low viscosity and would stick more for a better but more dangerous explosion.
Which is more likely to be dangerous volcano that erupts frequently or a volcano that has been inactive for a hundreds years?
a volcano that hasn't been active for a hundred years because of viscosity which is the resistance to flow and one that has been inactive for a hundred years would have a low viscosity and would stick more for a better but more dangerous explosion.
Which is more likely to be dangerous---a volcano that erupts frequently or a volcano that has been inactive for a hundred years?
a volcano that hasn't been active for a hundred years because of viscosity which is the resistance to flow and one that has been inactive for a hundred years would have a low viscosity and would stick more for a better but more dangerous explosion.
