It should be "loquitur."
This phrase means "the thing speaks for itself."
No. There is no analog to res ipsa loquitor in Continental Law.
res ipso loquitor
res ipsa loquitor
Res Ipsa Loquitor applies to any situation in which there is only one way something could have happened. While it is relatively common in medical mal-practice, it can also be applied in many negligence cases.
Res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself), a doctrine in tort law, can establish a prima facie (evidence that sustains a judgment in the absence of contradictory evidence) case. It is not clear what you are asking in your question about "inland disputes" (definition?).
Res ipso loquitor = "the thing speaks for itself"For example, to sue a doctor for malpractice, they have to have done worse than be wrong or make a mistake - the law recognizes a doctor is not infallible - they must be clearly negligent and provide substandard care. So if you hire a surgeon to take out your inflamed appendix, you still have stomach pain after the operation, and an X-ray shows a scalpel left behind, the scalpel is res ipso loquitor of negligence; there is no legitimate reason for a scalpel to be left behind in a patient.
The motto of John Oliver Secondary School is 'Virtus Vincit'.
spa in Tagalog: ispa
This is very likely a misquotation of the common Latin phrase (originally spoken by Cicero), res ipsa loquitur, "the matter itself speaks" (usually translated "the thing speaks for itself"). It is used in common law to mean that the nature of an accident can be sufficient evidence of negligence all by itself, even without independent evidence concerning the defendant's behavior.
He/She speaks as a stage direction.
The Practice - 1997 Race Ipsa Loquitor 4-15 is rated/received certificates of: Netherlands:12
21,300 Spas in the US, according to the ISPA.