by
The appropriate preposition after "incorporated" depends on the context. Some common prepositions used with "incorporated" include "into" and "within." For example, "The new policies were incorporated into the company's procedures" or "The team was incorporated within the larger organization."
The preposition is 'on an island'.Unless, of course, you've gone to a lot of trouble digging out a place where you can actually be in the island (underground).The preposition 'in the islands' is appropriate when referring to a group of islands, such as 'in the Bahamas' or 'in the Florida keys' as a group of islands represents a region; you can be in a region.
No, then is not a preposition. It is a conjuction.Than is a preposition.
If is not a preposition. It is a conjunction.
No,a preposition does not have to have a preposition phrase,but a prepositional phrase does have to have a preposition
The object of the preposition follows the preposition.
to
'In' is correct.
just stop being a nerd
When appropriate and loving discipline is incorporated, that is nurturing.
The preposition is 'on an island'.Unless, of course, you've gone to a lot of trouble digging out a place where you can actually be in the island (underground).The preposition 'in the islands' is appropriate when referring to a group of islands, such as 'in the Bahamas' or 'in the Florida keys' as a group of islands represents a region; you can be in a region.
The ablative of accompaniment requires the appropriate case endings on the affected noun, and the preposition 'cum', which means 'with'. But the ablatives of instrument and of means require only the appropriate case endings on the affected noun. Neither one needs any preposition.
Though there is, generally, no rule against ending a sentence with a preposition, the example cited here is, in fact, gramatically incorrect, which is why I separated it from the main question.Separating a preposition from its object (which is normally what you're talking about when you say "end a sentence with a preposition") is more accurately referred to as "preposition stranding", and is perfectly acceptable in the English language, either written or spoken, formal or informal.What's wrong with the sentence, "Can you go with?" is not that the preposition (with) is separated from its object, but that the object is completely missing.In addition to being improper English, this is also one of my all-time pet peeves.
Though there is, generally, no rule against ending a sentence with a preposition, the example cited here is, in fact, gramatically incorrect, which is why I separated it from the main question.Separating a preposition from its object (which is normally what you're talking about when you say "end a sentence with a preposition") is more accurately referred to as "preposition stranding", and is perfectly acceptable in the English language, either written or spoken, formal or informal.What's wrong with the sentence, "Can you go with?" is not that the preposition (with) is separated from its object, but that the object is completely missing.In addition to being improper English, this is also one of my all-time pet peeves.
No, then is not a preposition. It is a conjuction.Than is a preposition.
No, then is not a preposition. It is a conjuction.Than is a preposition.
If is not a preposition. It is a conjunction.
Yes, the objective, personal pronoun 'him' functioning as the object of the preposition 'at' is the correct form.However, the preposition 'at' is a bit clumsy. A more appropriate preposition in this sentence is 'for'.Example: Both the teachers and the students were delighted for him receiving such high scores.This is easier to see when the sentence is simplified, "Teachers and students were delighted for him."