Experimentation.
They are scientific theories.
the relationship between a scientific investigation and a scientific knowledge is that they lead to constantly changing.
None do. By definition, superstitious beliefs do not have a scientific basis.
There are none. By definition, a supersition does not have a scientific basis.
A reason to revise scientific knowledge is this is not a easy subject and we always have to study carefully and revise it.
Scientific reasoning, because there is a basis/structure behind it i.e. general knowledge.
how can scientific knowledge be modifiel
Scientific knowledge is not absolute.
No, superstitions by definition do not have a scientific basis.
there is no scientific basis for Gnosticism or orthodox (mainstream) Christianity.
No. By definition superstitions do not have a scientific basis.
There is no scientific basis for this it is a superstitious belief not a scientific one.
The lack of a scientific basis is one of the DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS of a superstition. If there is a scientific basis for something, it would no longer be fair to call it a superstition.
Holmes Martins established the scientific basis of vaccination.
No. By definition, a superstition is a belief that does not have a scientific basis.
Do superstition about comets and asteriods have scientific basis. "Why or why not"
As they lacked our scientific knowledge to explain natural events, they invented myths to explain them. The myths were religious in focus. Even today, with clear scientific knowledge and explanations, many people still accept a religious basis for natural happenings.