Experimentation.
None do. By definition, superstitious beliefs do not have a scientific basis.
There are none. By definition, a supersition does not have a scientific basis.
"Scientific knowledge" is a noun phrase. In this phrase, "scientific" functions as an adjective that describes the noun "knowledge," specifying the type of knowledge being referred to.
the relationship between a scientific investigation and a scientific knowledge is that they lead to constantly changing.
That would be referred to as the body of knowledge or the scientific knowledge base within that specific scientific discipline.
Scientific reasoning, because there is a basis/structure behind it i.e. general knowledge.
how can scientific knowledge be modifiel
there is no scientific basis for Gnosticism or orthodox (mainstream) Christianity.
No. By definition superstitions do not have a scientific basis.
No, superstitions by definition do not have a scientific basis.
Scientific knowledge is not absolute.
There is no scientific basis for this it is a superstitious belief not a scientific one.
The lack of a scientific basis is one of the DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS of a superstition. If there is a scientific basis for something, it would no longer be fair to call it a superstition.
No. By definition, a superstition is a belief that does not have a scientific basis.
Do superstition about comets and asteriods have scientific basis. "Why or why not"
Holmes Martins established the scientific basis of vaccination.
As they lacked our scientific knowledge to explain natural events, they invented myths to explain them. The myths were religious in focus. Even today, with clear scientific knowledge and explanations, many people still accept a religious basis for natural happenings.