Ever since the Norman Invasion gave certain English speakers an inferiority complex, schoolmarms declare it "better" to use the French comparative form with some adjectives, preferring the form more useless. The native form uselesser may be considered substandard by some editors, but it is not wrong.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little. The superlative degree is least.
"More important" is the comparative degree of important.
"Merrily" is the positive degree of the adverb "merrily."Specifically, the degrees of an adverb range from the basic, positive degree to the second, comparative degree to the third, highest, superlative degree. So the comparative degree in this case is "more merrily." The superlative degree is "most merrily."
there is no such thing as the superlative and comparative degree of better because better is the comparative form for well or good and the superlative for good or well is best
No, "useless" is not a comparative adjective. It is a simple adjective used to describe something that has no use or value.
Teapot is a noun and, as such, does not have a comparative degree.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little.
The comparative degree is bigger.
The comparative degree is wider.
Thriftier is the comparative degree of thrifty.
"Speed" is a noun and a verb and, as such, does not have a comparative degree. The comparative of the adjective speedy is speedier.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little. The superlative degree is least.
"Message" is a noun and (these days) a verb and, as such, does not have a comparative degree.
"More important" is the comparative degree of important.
The comparative degree of "sad" is "sadder."
comparative degree of amiable