It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
A hypothesis needs to be testable because if you do not test your hypothesis, how do you know your theory/thoughts is correct or bogus? If you have a hypothesis that you can't test, then how do you prove that your hypothesis will work or not, there wouldn't be a need for a hypothesis if you don't do anything but just say it with out proof or credit.
A hypothesis is tested to verify its validity or not. The more it gives consistent answers by repeated experiments, observations or both, the more valid it is. If it survives the test of repeatability it becomes a theory, and if established as immutable, a law.
A scientific theory or hypothesis must be able to make predictions that can be tested. It must be possible to design an experiment so that there is one outcome if the hypothesis is true and a different outcome if it is false. This is what is meant by saying that a hypothesis is testable or falsifiable. If such as experiment is carried out and the outcome is not as predicted then the hypothesis must be rejected and replaced by an alternative hypothesis - or a modified version.
If a hypothesis does not generate any observational tests, there is nothing that a scientist can do with it
It must be testable in order to be found true or false.
It must be testable in order to be found true or false.
-Apex
A hypothesis has to be testable in order to prove or disprove its validity. A hypothesis is only an estimate of what will happen in certain situations.
A scientific hypothesis must be tetable so it can become a scientific theory.
A testable hypothesis is one which you can formulate an experiment around
* something testable * have to have tools * dependent and independent variables * groups (control and experimental) * something "do-able"
It must be testable.
If ... then... ex. if it is raining outside then it is wet outside.
"A hypothesis is a proposed answer to a question. To answer the question raised by your observations, the hypothesis must be testable." it means that you need to be able to prove that your hypothesis is true or not by creating an experiment and collect/analyze the data
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
A 'testable' hypothesis is one in which you are able to conduct experiments in able to prove right or wrong.
* something testable * have to have tools * dependent and independent variables * groups (control and experimental) * something "do-able"
A scientific theory or hypothesis must be able to make predictions that can be tested. It must be possible to design an experiment so that there is one outcome if the hypothesis is true and a different outcome if it is false. This is what is meant by saying that a hypothesis is testable or falsifiable. If such as experiment is carried out and the outcome is not as predicted then the hypothesis must be rejected and replaced by an alternative hypothesis - or a modified version.
In Karl Popper's terminology there must be a way to prove a hypothesis false. That is what it means when scientists say that a specific hypothesis is a "testable hypothesis".
capable of being proven false. testable
testable
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
It must be testable.
It must be testable.
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.
so it can be proven
It must be testable.