HTML5 does not reuqire any more downloads except for your browser. Plugins require and extra download, which can use disk space. However, the better one depends on how fast your computer is sometimes. I perfer plugins since HTML5 lags my PC.
DHTML combines HTML, JavaScript, the HTML DOM, and CSS.
hello
http://dhivacpt.blogspot.com/2007/10/difference-between-ddr1-and-ddr2.html
Client side HTML can be seen as dynamic HTML but not much effective. Server Side Dynamic HTML is much more effective.
I do not think you will see any difference at all. .
Only the HTML tags differ Atom Feed is similar to RSS Fees but it differ only in HTML tag
A diferença é que um envia o comando HTML e o outro não
In truth, there's almost no difference between the HTML used in web 2.0 applications, and the HTML used in all other HTML applications. The difference is mainly in the way that the user interacts with the page, and this is provided mainly by the tighter coupling of JavaScript and backend programming like PHP, as well as the ability to transfer data between both using asynchronous calls (AJAX.)
When you save an HTML file, the contents of that file are written on the hard drive. This has the effect of changing the contents of the file. When you read and HTML file, the file remains unchanged on the disk.
The main difference is that HTML is used to create dynamic web pages. Other than this HTML cannot do much.
in programming, single quotes are for characters, and double quotes are for string, but in php, javascript, html, css i don't see any difference between the two.
basikly xhtml is a mics of html and xml. the difference in html and xhtml is that xhtml is a more strict on the syntax and defined as a xml document. xml is a self defined language... in short it is a strikter html in xml format...