answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In a conference, a group of scientists from the same field reviews the paper. In a peer review, members from other fields review the paper.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the difference between reviewing a scientific paper in a conference and submitting a paper during the peer review process?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When was NAS Award for Scientific Reviewing created?

NAS Award for Scientific Reviewing was created in 1979.


The third step in the scientific method is reviewing the literature?

it is reviewing the literature and making it right


Why is scientific argumentation an important part when reviewing and explanations?

Strength and usefulness of claims are evaluated through scientific argumentation.


Why is scientific argument-ion an important part when reviewing results and explanations?

Strength and usefulness of claims are evaluated through scientific argumentation.


How does one form form a scientific hypothesis?

by reviewing whats is already known


What is the process called where a scholar's research is accepted as true and scientific?

DESSERTATION


What is a proposal work schedule?

A proposal work schedule outlines the timeline and tasks necessary to complete a proposal. It includes deadlines for drafting, reviewing, and submitting the proposal, as well as assigning responsibilities to team members. This schedule is crucial for staying organized and ensuring the timely completion of the proposal.


Who is responsible for reviewing and closing cases?

The A/BO is responsible for reviewing and closing cases.


Chapter 12 Reviewing the Basics?

reviewing the basics chapter 2 a+ guide from jean Andrews


The SQ3R study method emphasizes the importance of?

Reviewing Material


Is not one of the six steps usually used by employers in a resume reviewing process?

reviewing salary requirements


What are some drawbacks to peer reviewing?

Perhaps one of the greatest drawbacks of peer reviewing is that there may be personal bias that may cloud the actual review. Also, the person reviewing the material may not be knowledgeable on the subject.