What is the difference between hypothesis and the scientific method?

Answer 1

the hypothesis is part of the scientific method. the scientific method is just a bunch of steps you have to take when doing an experiment. the hypothesis is just the step where you predict what the outcome of the experiment will be.

Answer 2

A hypothesis is an important part, a sub-element, of the scientific method. It is the guess that a scientist makes in an attempt to explain particular observational results, often and preferably, employing mathematical models. Observation is also a sub-element of the scientific method.

A few examples:

Neil Bohr in finding the radius of the atom and the energy of the electron in the orbits around the nucleus of the atom, he made some assumptions:

In classical physics, any accelerated charge should give out energy in the form of radiation. Therefor, no electron can steadily revolve around the nucleus as it is accelerated, centripetally. So Bohr made his postulate as there are chances for charged particles to be silent without any radiation even though they are accelerated. But, to arrive at the desired result he laid a condition that the angular momentum of the revolving electron must be an integral multiple of h/2pi.

Another example is the postulate made by Albert Einstein:

He postulated that the speed of light is the same, even when there is a relative movement between the light source and the observer.

So, a postulate lacks a firm scientific basis, and only shows that some reasonable explanations can be made for certain observations. Postulates are short of hypotheses, theories, or laws and are only a part of the scientific method, which includes all painstaking experimentation, peer review, proof of repeatability, etc. done over at so many places and with different situations, while having good control over related variables.

Answer 3

A hypothesis is an important part, a sub-element, of the scientific method. It is the guess that a scientist makes in an attempt to explain particular observational results, often and preferably, employing mathematical models. Observation is also a sub-element of the scientific method.

A few examples:

Neil Bohr in finding the radius of the atom and the energy of the electron in the orbits around the nucleus of the atom, he made some assumptions:

In classical physics, any accelerated charge should give out energy in the form of radiation. Therefor, no electron can steadily revolve around the nucleus as it is accelerated, centripetally. So Bohr made his postulate as there are chances for charged particles to be silent without any radiation even though they are accelerated. But, to arrive at the desired result he laid a condition that the angular momentum of the revolving electron must be an integral multiple of h/2pi.

Another example is the postulate made by Albert Einstein:

He postulated that the speed of light is the same, even when there is a relative movement between the light source and the observer.

So, a postulate lacks a firm scientific basis, and only shows that some reasonable explanations can be made for certain observations. Postulates are short of hypotheses, theories, or laws and are only a part of the scientific method, which includes all painstaking experimentation, peer review, proof of repeatability, etc. done over at so many places and with different situations, while having good control over related variables.