Summary offences are dealt with by a magistrate in the Magistrates' Court. They include less serious offences, and can be punishable by shorter prison sentences and smaller fines. Accused must not necessarily be in person for the trial. Jury trials or preliminary inquiries are not held.
Indictable offences are more serious. They can be heard in a higher court (the County Court or Supreme Court) by a judge and jury. Accused must necessarily be in person for the trial. Preliminary inquires are held.
Indictable offences are tried at the Crown Court. Summary offences are tried at the Magistrate's Court. Mode of trial for all offences, ie whether an offence is to be tried as Summary or Indictable, is decided by the Magistrate's Court. There are some offences that can be tried either way and in such circumstances the Magistrates will decide what type of trial will go ahead - although in such circumstances the individual can choose to go to Crown Court (but should be aware that the punishment and costs may be more severe). Magistrate's dealing with Summary trials are voluntary lay people who judge lesser offences such as minor road traffic violations, theft, public order, for example. Although there are exceptions, generally speaking Magistrates have power to imprison for a maximum of 6 months, can order compensation of up to a maximum of £5,000 and have more limited powers than Judges in the Crown Court. Indictable offences are tried at the Crown Court in front of a Judge and Jury. Indictable offences are generally far more serious and include such things as rape, murder, dangerous driving. Powers of punishment are far greater in the Crown Court.
indictable is more serious offence.
Yes
Committing perjury is an indictable offense rather than a summary offense. A person who commits perjury is always in the position to be indicted when involved in a court case.
Some very minor charges are only charged as a summary offense and the most serious only can be indictable. Many charges fall in between this spectrum and can be charged either way. All hybrid offenses are considered indictable until the crown attorney decides how they want to prosecute you.
In Canada, a hybrid offence is considered an indictable offence. For instance, there is no obligation to have your fingerprint taken if you are charge with a summary offence, but your fingerprint will be taken if your are charge with an hybrid offence, even if the prosecutor opted for summary conviction.
The difference between abstract and summary is that an abstract is a short from of a summary.
Offences (under British law) that can be tried at either a Magistrate's Court or a Crown Court. This means that that it involves the sort of 'mid-range' crimes, i.e. somewhere in between indictable offences and summary offences - theft, assault with non-severe consequences.Source: Martin: The English Legal System.www.theenglishlegalsystem.co.uk
After being arrested the officer in charge of the lock up or station may release people charged with a summary offenses. Or they can charge you with indictable offense, the accused must be brought before the judge in 24 hours for bail hearing.
It means it's classified as a summary offense.
Interquartile range.
Range.
The range
Same thing as far as I know. Wrote the test that had been reffered as presi (english summary) test.