0
Transubstantiation--The bread and wine of the Holy Sacrament become the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Only the accidents of bread and wine remain.
Consubstantiation--An error which maintains that the Savior unites Himself for a short period of time to the bread and wine which remain fully and completely bread and wine.
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between a samurai and shogun?
The difference between a shogun and a samurai is like the difference between a king and a knight.
What is the difference between protein rebonding and milk rebonding?
there is no difference between this two...
What is the difference between a whole number a?
A question about "the difference between" requires two objects!
How do you explain the difference between the vassals and serfs?
Explain the difference between the vassals and the serfs
The difference between a number and 3?
the difference between a number and 3 is
What is the opposite of transubstantiation?
consubstantiation it means that the presence of Jesus is present alongside the actual communion bread and wine. not actually in it like transubstantiation.
Did Luther believe in transubstantiation?
No, Martin Luther did not believe in transubstantiation. He rejected the Catholic doctrine that the bread and wine in the Eucharist physically transform into the body and blood of Christ. Instead, he believed in the concept of consubstantiation, where the body and blood of Christ coexist with the bread and wine.
What is the difference in belief in the Eucharist between the Catholic the Episcopal the Presbyterians and other Protestant denominations?
The theological differences between different denominations is great... the meaning probably can be said to be the same. The Eucharist is believed to be the Body of Christ. Theologically the means whereby this comes about is: Catholics believe in transubstantiation Lutherans: consubstantiation Episcopals "transignification"; Calvin... a mystery. For all: "The Body of Christ"
What is the meaning of transubstantiation?
A change into another substance., The doctrine held by Roman Catholics, that the bread and wine in the Mass is converted into the body and blood of Christ; -- distinguished from consubstantiation, and impanation.
What was consubstantiation?
Consubstantiation is Martin Luther's view that Christ is present along side the bread and wine for the duration of the service, but that He leaves, and it is purely bread and wine again after the service is over. During the service, not only is Christ present, but the bread and wine are still there. The concept is completely opposed to the Catholic view, which is transubstantiation.
Why does martin Luther believe in consubstantiation?
Martin Luther believed in consubstantiation, also known as sacramental union, because he interpreted the Bible to teach that in the Eucharist, the bread and wine coexist with the body and blood of Christ. Luther rejected the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation, which teaches that the bread and wine are transformed into the literal body and blood of Christ.
What does consubstanciation mean?
The doctrine of consubstantiation is a Lutheran doctrine that states that the Christ's Eucharist, or the process by which the wine and bread at communion literally becomes the blood and body of Jesus is not true. Instead the doctrine of consubstantiation states that the wine and bread spiritually become the blood and body of Christ.
Explain the difference between transubstantiation and consubstantiation?
The Lutheran Church does not hold to consubstantiation or transubstantiation because it refuses to speak of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper in philosophical terns. The Lutheran Church takes a literal view of Jesus' words when he said, "This is my Body, and this is my Blood." He did not say, "This represents, symbolizes or means my body and blood, but this "is" my blood and body. Lutherans call this view "Real Presence" meaning that Jesus' true Body and Blood are actually, truly and substantially in, with, and under the bread and the wine. Thus, when one receives the wafer, one is actually and truly receiving Jesus along with the bread. The difference with transubstantiation is that transubstantiation holds that the bread is no longer bread, but wholly Jesus' Body. Lutheran's would say that Jesus is actually present in, with, and under the bread, but there is still bread present in the Sacrament. This view in the Lutheran Church is tied to First Corinthians 10:16 where St. Paul writes, "And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ?" In addition, Paul writes in First Corinthians 11:26 "For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes." Also, First Corinthians 11:27 "Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord." These references speak of the Host being bread as well as the Body of Christ.
Why do Protestants reject the belief in transubstantiation?
Protestants reject the belief in transubstantiation because they interpret the Eucharist symbolically rather than literally. They believe that the bread and wine used in communion represent the body and blood of Christ, rather than actually becoming them. This difference in interpretation stems from theological differences between Protestantism and Catholicism.
What questions could you ask a vicar?
Consubstantiation
What church believes in Consubstantiation?
Catholic Church
Do you have to pray to Mary and saints to be orthodox?
I believe as well that another point which needs to be stressed here regards the issue of transubstantiation vs. consubstantiation. Lutherans as I recall do not believe in transubstantiation or the concept that at communion the "Lord's supper" literaly becomes the body and blood of Jesus as we observe and particiate in that act of worship. As I recall, Luther belived in consubstantion....not that the wine and bread literally became Jesus' body within us, but that at that observance there was at least a "presence" of the Holy Spirit there.
