0
Essentially binding precedent means that if a higher court has ruled on what is substantially the same legal issue, then that ruling is binding on the lower courts. This is designed to build up a consistent body of law, so for example, we dont have 30 different interpretations of 1 section of statute.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the principles under the doctrine of binding precedent?
The principles under the doctrine of binding precedent are that the courts must use past solutions. They apply when the law is not unreasonable or inconvenient.
What is a legal precedent?
a legal precedent is principles of law set down by a higher court that are binding on lower courts in the same hierachy
What impact has the human rights act 1998 had on the doctrine of precedent under the common law?
not much. as the common was already protecting the rights of the people. the Act just made it binding on both judiciary and the parliament and also the government .
What is the difference between a binding precedent and a persuasive precedent?
A binding precedent is precedent that a court MUST follow (it is law). All prior judicial decisions in a specific court's jurisdiction heard at that court's level or higher are considered to be binding precedent. In contrast, persuasive precedent is precedent that a court need not follow (it is NOT law, but, as the name suggests, may be persuasive because it suggests a line of reasoning). All prior judicial decisions OUTSIDE of that court's jurisdiction or from a LOWER court are considered to be persuasive only.
Would a ruling by the federal appeals court for my circuit be binding precedent if I file a federal law claim in a state court?
If the Federal Court precedent is applicable to your situation it can be cited - HOWEVER - although they may consider it, it does NOT mean that it would be binding on them.
In British law is a text message legally binding?
There is no reason why a text message 'contract' should not be legally binding, however there have not been any precedent setting cases on the issue.
What is an example of binding precedent in English law?
Daniels v white(1938) decision was based upon Donoghue v Stephenson
How do you determine whether a case is mandatory or binding authority?
Mandatory refers to binding statutes and case law within the same jurisdiction.
What are the three precedents that stare decisis relies on?
I am unfamiliar with what three precedents the questioner is referring to. Stare Decisis can mean only ONE thing. 'Stare Decisis' is a Latin term meaning "to stand by things already decided." It is a legal doctrine where courts generally follow the application of the law as decided in similar prior cases (which is referred to as following precedent). Precedent means that the principle announced by a higher court must be followed in later cases. The requirement that a lower court must follow a precedent is called stare decisis.In case the question relates to the three elements the legal system requires to operate a doctrine of precedent, they are1. Law reporting;2. a hierarchical court structure; and3. Binding elements; ratio decidendi and obiter dicta
Why does law making through courts usually only occur when a case is heard on appeal?
The judiciary was made to interpret law. Through the way in which the law is interpreted law is made for inferior courts to follow. See doctrine of precedent.
'doctrine of precedent suitable for nation of sheep'do you agree discuss setting out argument for or against doctrine of binding precedent?
Answer The term, "nation of sheep" implies a total lack of autonomous decision-making, based upon the metaphorical creatures known to continue blindly once pointed on the way. This demonstrates a fundamental flaw in the implied premise of the question, because it only takes one new case to overturn a bad precedent. The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned its own precedents over a hundred times. However, the value of binding precedent is that the outcome of cases become that much more predictable, and thus avoidable, at least in theory. For each case that law books capture in appellate reporters, there may be hundreds that were never filed or never made it to appeals because the lawyers involved understood the risks of challenging precedents.
Explain the operation of precedent and stare decisis on case law?
Relating to the law of precedents, the concept of stare decisis relates to the binding nature of an earlier decision over a subsequent court called upon to decide over a similar issue.Stare Decisis operates at two levels:1. Binding precedent (or mandatory authority); and2. Persuasive precedentBinding precedent is when a similar matter has been decided upon by a superior court, a junior or subordinate court is required to follow the ruling.Persuasive precedent is when a similar matter has been decided by a different bench of the same court, or a court of the same rank or junior / subordinate court.
