Want this question answered?
You can't prove a negative with direct evidence.
pangaea
Pangaea.
1. There were fossils found on different sides of continents, that were the same. 2. If you put all the continents together they fit like puzzle pices in a puzzle. Hope I helped!
The supercontinent was called Pangea.
Evidence to prove the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea includes fossil evidence of similar plant and animal species across continents, the matching shapes of coastlines and mountain ranges on different continents, and the distribution of ancient rock formations that line up when continents are fitted together. Additionally, geological evidence such as rock layers and paleoclimatic data also supports the theory of Pangaea's existence.
You can't prove a negative with direct evidence.
Pangaea Supercontinent
pangaea
Pangaea.
No,because geologist have evidence that,before Pangaea existed, other supercontinents formed and split apart over billions of years. And the answer is right because i took it out of the Science book!!
Pangaea.
the name of the continent that existed 225 million years ago was pangaea
1. There were fossils found on different sides of continents, that were the same. 2. If you put all the continents together they fit like puzzle pices in a puzzle. Hope I helped!
it may be pangaea
The supercontinent Pangaea was formed about 335 million years ago and split into two large landmasses, Laurasia and Gondwana, around 180 million years ago. The modern countries we know today did not exist during Pangaea's time, as landmasses were still connected.
The supercontinent was called Pangea.