0
Average at 2 tons an hour or 4400 pounds. There's also a number of penalties apply, e.g. gear down is 100%+ to consumption.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 757?
5000kg
Fuel consumption Boeing 787?
0,024 l/km and seat
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 787?
2 litter per km
What is the Fuel consumption of a Boeing 737?
While the actual fuel consumptions of the Boeing 737 depend on several factors there is an average that is widely used. It is estimated that the Boeing 737 uses about one gallon of fuel every second.
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767-200 ER aircraft on a 7 hour flight?
The fuel consumption of a Boeing 767-200 ER aircraft on a 7 hour flight is approximately 8,400 gallons. This equates to around $46,000 for the flight.
Which fuel does Boeing 777 use?
The Boeing 777 uses an airplane grade of diesel similar to that of diesel trucks. Type #2 Kerosene is the diesel fuel used for the Boeing 777. The Boeing 777 has a higher fuel capacity and is more efficient at fuel consumption than earlier models like the 747.
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767 200 in pounds per hour?
1722 gallons per hour.
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767-200 in pounds per hour?
1722 gallons per hour.
What is the fuel consumption of Boeing 737 per KM per Liter?
Boeing 737-800 uses approx 1.1 MJ of fuel per seat km (+/- 10 %). This equals about 2.93 Liters/seat/100km.
What is the fuel consumption in US gallons of a Boeing 737-800 per nautical mile?
That is dependant on the wind, altitude and speed.
What is the fuel consumption of Boeing 787?
There are many variables to figuring fuel consumption such as airspeed, altitude, and throttle settings. The average used for flight planning is 12,500 pounds per hour, or 1840 gallons per hour.
What is the fuel consumption of a Boeing 767?
A Boeing 767 aircraft that is carrying passengers from New York to London would need about 45 gallons per passenger in order to make the trip. This makes the Boeing 767 far more fuel-efficient than a car, which would need twice as much fuel in order to make that distance.
