The upper limit for F5 winds were originally set at 318 mph. This is somewhat of a tricky thing, though, as tornado ratings are based on the severity of the damage, which is used to estimate wind speed. The problem is, damage caused by F5 winds is so complete, it is impossible to determine if winds were faster.
When the Enhanced Fujita scale replaced the Fujita scale in 2007, the new EF5 category had no set upper limit for wind speed.
As the original Fujita scale estimated, the maximum wind speed for an F5 tornado was 318 mph. However, it would be impossible for a tornado to be rated higher than F5 as actual ratings are based on damage and F5 damage leaves no room of a higher category. On the newer Enhanced Fujita scale the highest category, EF5, has no upper bound for wind speeds.
The Highest wind speed ever recorded in a tornado was 302 mph (some sources say 318 mph) in the F5 tornado that struck Moore and Bridgecreek Oklahoma on May 3, 1999. This tornado is sometimes referred to as the Oklahoma City tornado
The highest category tornado is a F5 or EF5
The Xenia, Ohio tornado of 1974 never actually had its wind speed measured as we did not have the necessary technology at the time. However, based on damage the tornado was rated F5, the highest category on the Fujita scale, which would put estimated winds in the range of 261-318 mph. Even considering the fact that this scale overestimated wind speed, that would still put the Xenia tornado's wind speed at well over 200 mph.
The highest rating a tornado can attain in the Fujita scale is F5.
As the original Fujita scale estimated, the maximum wind speed for an F5 tornado was 318 mph. However, it would be impossible for a tornado to be rated higher than F5 as actual ratings are based on damage and F5 damage leaves no room of a higher category. On the newer Enhanced Fujita scale the highest category, EF5, has no upper bound for wind speeds.
The Highest wind speed ever recorded in a tornado was 302 mph (some sources say 318 mph) in the F5 tornado that struck Moore and Bridgecreek Oklahoma on May 3, 1999. This tornado is sometimes referred to as the Oklahoma City tornado
The highest category tornado is a F5 or EF5
The Xenia, Ohio tornado of 1974 never actually had its wind speed measured as we did not have the necessary technology at the time. However, based on damage the tornado was rated F5, the highest category on the Fujita scale, which would put estimated winds in the range of 261-318 mph. Even considering the fact that this scale overestimated wind speed, that would still put the Xenia tornado's wind speed at well over 200 mph.
No. The highest rating a tornado can get is F5 or EF5.
No. The highest rating a tornado can attain is F5.
There is no given forward speed for a tornado of any rating. Like most tornadoes, an F5 can be anywhere from stationary to moving at 70 mph. Wind speeds inside an EF5 tornado (essentially the same rating with corrected wind speeds) are in excess of 200 mph.
The highest rating a tornado can attain in the Fujita scale is F5.
Tornado ratings are based on damage, so the wind speeds for any given rating are estimates. The original estimated wind speed range for an F5 tornado was 261-318 mph. This estimate is now believed to have been too high. Currently, a tornado with estimate winds in excess of 200 mph is rated EF5, though the damage inflicted is the same as that from an F5.
The fastest winds on Earth are found in violent tornadoes. The current wind speed record is held by an F5 tornado that struck the Oklahoma City area on May 3, 1999 with winds as high as 302 mph.
The fatest winds on earth occur in violent tornadoes. How strong the winds can actually get is not known for certain, as measurements are rare. The highest recorded wind speed was a gust to 302 mph recorded in the F5 tornado that devastated the Oklahoma City area on May 3, 1999.
No. Wind speed measurement was ever taken from the Waco tornado. Since it was later rated F5 that would mean wind speeds were estimated to have exceeded 260 mph at some points, though later information indicates that this may have been an overestimate.