Want this question answered?
Pages at links below.
Double-check your procedure and your lab technique. If they're still not what you predicted after eliminating any potential sources of error, then evidently you've learned that your initial premises were wrong, and you'll have to reject your hypothesis since you've proven that it's false.
Why would i know! The visible spectrun of sunlight has seven color depending on the wave lenght. Violet light has minimum wave lenght and red light has maximum wave lenght. It is the red light which favours maximum plant growth and the green light brings minimum.
Attributes you will bring to the lab?
It's most likely a "Biology Lab".
The lab would be used to test your hypothesis to whether or not you were correct. You would first want to form a hypothesis and then gather data to support or discredit your hypothesis. The hypothesis could be testing anything essentially.
Just did this lab in Biology. Onion cells do not have chloroplasts; therefore, they do not possess the green pigment, chlorophyll, that chloroplasts produce. Elodea plants do carry out photosynthesis.
A hypothesis is an uneducated guess, statement, or observation during a Lab and the hypothesis needs to be tested. So mainly it isn't the conclusion to an experiment.
eat Twizzlers
In a lab or wherever they can conduct an experiment
Today I just did a lab viewing elodea cells and human cheek cells. When I viewed the Elodea cells on the highest power, I saw chloroplasts moving. They looked like tiny green spheres moving in little groups of two or more on a set of "tracks". I hope this answers the question.
The hypothesis.
lolololo
The good example will be noting
Rejecting null hypothesis means that rumour of a fact is been experimented in d lab and the reseacher later discovered that hypothesis pseudo i.e fack fact but not a theory
Pages at links below.
problem hypothesis materials procedure variables observation conclusion