It means something you wouldn't do in front of your granny.
i believe its exactly what its says on the tin... instead of gaining from something morally, ethically or socially wrong don't do it.. loose out :) :)
Both. It is also could be criminal.
When you know that in the situation would be morally wrong. To go by what is right and what is ethically the right thing to do in the situation.
That relationship is completely fine ethically and legally.
single parents are discriminated because the overnment want you to think its wrong and that it is not ethically right trust me, its a conspiracy
Mostly because of the civilian casualties, the illness it brought and the devastation.
No, it's not illegal to say that anywhere. It is, however, just an opinion, and to try to force that opinion into law or use it to persecute gay people is ethically wrong.No, it's not illegal to say that anywhere. It is, however, just an opinion, and to try to force that opinion into law or use it to persecute gay people is ethically wrong.
Your question has been answered many times, but as you ask "What are the similarities" and not "What is the difference" I will attempt to answer your question. First Ethics, these are ideas based on what you know to be right and wrong. Morality is based on the distinction between good and evil or right and wrong. Both are similar in meaning and so both could be used in a written sentence or by word of mouth. An example would be "You could hit me, but ethically you would be wrong in doing so, as I had not done anything to deserve your doing so". In the same sentence we replace ethically with the word morally.Respectfully.
As long as it harms no one else, then no.
Yes. Even if you feel that you are ethically justified in using software without paying for it, it is illegal to do so.
Ethically it means you have done something wrong morally or legally. If you have literally got blood on your hands call your lawyer.
The ethics of the Patriot Act can be debated from various perspectives. Critics argue that it infringes on civil liberties and privacy rights by enabling extensive surveillance and reducing due process protections. Supporters contend that it is necessary for national security and protecting citizens from terrorism. Ultimately, whether it is ethically wrong depends on one's values regarding security versus individual freedoms.