Every military member has an immediate superior. That superior has a superior, and right on up to the President. Using the chain of command means that soldiers/sailors receive orders and ask questions first from/to their immediate superior. "Jumping" the chain of command, by bypassing the immediate superior is greatly frowned upon.
I think this is what you are looking for:PresidentVice PresidentSpeaker of the HousePresident pro tempore of the SenateSecretary of StateSecretary of the TreasurySecretary of Defense.Attorney GeneralSecretary of the InteriorSecretary of AgricultureSecretary of CommerceSecretary of LaborSecretary of Health and Human ServicesSecretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentSecretary of TransportationSecretary of EnergySecretary of EducationSecretary of Veterans AffairsSecretary of Homeland SecurityFollowing the last position above would be the top military commander/s. (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff & Secretaries of the Army, Navy, & Air Force.)The US Govt. does not have a "Chain of Command" because it is not a military structure. It's actually called the "Order of Succession", a government term, and is commonly confused with the Military term "Chain of Command". The Chain of Command is the line of authority and responsibility along which orders are passed within a military unit and between different units.Example:Army Chain of CommandCommander-in-ChiefSecretary of DefenseSecretary of the ArmyChairman, Joint Chief of Staff US ArmyArmy Chief of StaffTRADOC CommanderAccessions Command CommanderCadet Command Commander4th Brigade CommanderSergeant Major Of The ArmyTRADOC CSMAccessions Command CSMCadet Command CSM4th Brigade CSM
The US military chain of command for all services starts with the President of the United States, as the Commander and Chief. After the President there are thousands of permutations of the Chain of Command to the individual soldier, sailor, airman, marine, or coastguardsman.
Chain of Command - film - was created in 2000.
Are there articles under the UCMJ that outline deviating from the Chain of Command?
No -- not when it is being used as a noun phrase by itself. ("She was at the bottom of the chain of command.") However, you would hyphenated it if this noun phrase was being used to modify a noun that came after it: "The ship was plagued by chain-of-command issues." "The comapny had to clarify its chain-of-command policy."
Not the military chain of command, no.
secretaries
the Combatant Commanders
the Secretaries of the Military Departments and then to the Service Chiefs
chain of command
military
Operational command = you can tell them what to do. Operational control = you can make them do it
Chain of command.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs who oversees the Armed Forces is Admiral Michael Mullen .However, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is an advisoryposition, not an authoritative one. That is, all the Chiefs of Staff do not sit in the direct military chain-of-command. They (and the civilians in the office of the Secretary of Defense) are responsible for the organizational operation of the US Military, not combat operations.After the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986, the US Military chain-of-command looks like this:PresidentSecretary of DefenseCommander of each of the Unified CommandsThe Unified Commands are essentially large theaters of operations, where the commander (who may be from any military branch) oversees all US military action in that theater.So, to answer your question, the Leader of the various US military branches is the US President, as he is the final (ultimate) operational command authority.
Chain of command is when one person reports to another. It is important, especially in military action. Something that is not chain of command is when one team of people reports hazardous road conditions to another team directly.
Canadian Operational Support Command's motto is 'Cum Honore Sustinemus'.
The senior military individual