You could run into the same name of an organism with similar appearance
The major limitation to the morphological concept of species is that
a.
there may be a great deal of phenotypic variability in a species.
b.
organisms that actually can interbreed may have very different physical characteristics.
c.
it does not consider whether individuals of a species can mate and produce viable offspring.
d.
All of the above
All of the above
An older and somewhat discarded concept that tried to delineate species by their morphological ( physical ) similarities. This presented too many problems, especially when their was analogous evolutionary processes going on. Two species conuld have developed the same adaptive answer to the some environmental problems and not even be evolutionarily closely related, but still physically resemble each other.
The concept of a species as an irreducible group whose members are descended from a common ancestor and who all posses a combination of certain defining or derived, traits.
It cannot be applied to extinct organisms.
that if you if you morph natural selection you get the lion king
it is either morphological or plylogenetic. I am leaning more to the morphological side.
Morphological concepts are those that are physical and can be seen, such as noses and eyes. Biological are things like blood lines and the inner workings of the cells in the body.
Genetic, behavioural and morphological divergence, or genetic drift.
Able to interbreed in the wild would be the biologicalspecies concept.
Genetic features, morphological features and behavioural features.
The main difference between the typological species concept and the morphological species concept is that the typological species concept classifies organisms that share characteristics that set them apart from others, whereas the morphological species concept classifies them as the same species if they appear identical.
there is no limitation
The morphological species concept differentiates species by their physical traits, basically. The biological species concept defines a species as generally organisms that breed with others of the same species; rather a genetic isolation concept. The phylogenetic concept is based on evolutionary relationships and is the concept used by cladists.
There is no known mechanism for the introduction of new genetic material.
it is either morphological or plylogenetic. I am leaning more to the morphological side.
A morphological species is a group of organisms that have a distinctive form: for example, we can distinguish between a chicken and a duck because they have different shaped bills and the duck has webbed feet. Species have been defined in this way since well before the beginning of recorded history. Although much criticised, the concept of morphological species remains the single most widely used species concept in everyday life, and still retains an important place within the biological sciences. So, no the interbreeding of a chicken and a duck will not produce viable eggs.
No. It is a genus (the level above species).
Biological species concept, phenetic species concept, reproductive competition species concept, evolutionary species concept, and the recognition species concept.
Aspect of biodiversity reflecting morphological differences among species.
Ecological species concept.
Comparision of mhoperlogical And biological species concept
some bacteria...