40,42.44.46.48.50
By counting by 2s
It is only because we count in tens - and 5 10 and 2 are factors.
4194304 = 222
The equivalent of 7s plus 2s is 9s.
9r2-4s2/9r+6sIt looks like you can factors the numerator(3r + 2s)(3r - 2s) [This is the factored form of 9r2-4s2]Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/9r+6sYou can also factor the denominator3(3r+2s)Put this back into the equation(3r+2s)(3r-2s)/3(3r+2s)You can cancel out the 3r+2s on top and bottom because they are the same they equal 1. Therefore your final answer is3r-2s over 3You could go further and say this is...r-(2/3)seither one is correct
By counting by 2s
2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16
2, 4, 6 3, 6 The LCM of 2 and 3 is 6.
2s - 12 + 2s = 4s - 124s - 12 = 4s - 124s = 4ss = s==========this is an identity and any number can be s
unknown
The maximum number of electrons in any s sublevel is 2, irrespective of what the principal quantum number, i.e., the number before the s in an electron configuration, may be.
21- only true legends know
It is a mixed number.
It is only because we count in tens - and 5 10 and 2 are factors.
The difference between the number of 2s and the number of 4s in a sum.
4194304 = 222
Yes