The word "hight" is an English word which means "to be named or called." There is no past tense form of hight, because hight is in fact a past participle.
sehcni76
No,it is a verb form. It is the past tense and past participle of the verb (to dart).
There are a few different forms of weave. Some of them are wove, which is the past tense form of the word, weaving, which is the current verb of the word, and woven, which is also a past tense.
type is regular, just add a 'd' to form the past tense. i.e. typedExample: Shakespeare never typed any of his plays.
The past tense is overflowed.
Much does not have a past tense as it's not a verb. Only verbs have past tenses.Much is an adjective and does not have a past tense.
The past tense form of "destroy" is "destroyed."
struck is the past tense verbStruck IS the past tense form...of the word strike.
Formed is the past tense of form.
The past tense of "lay" is "laid." For example, "I laid the book on the table."
The past tense form of "lay" is "laid."
Is and are are present tense form of be. The past tense of be is was/were.
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The past tense of "that" is "that." It remains the same in the past tense.
To is not a verb and does not have a past tense form.
Is can be used in the past tense if it's in its past tense form, which is was.
The past tense of "bled" is "bled." It is an irregular verb, and the past tense form remains the same as the base form.
The past tense form for wear is wore. Wear is present and wore is past. thank you.