peer review (:
Peer review
Peer review
yes
This is called peer review. A peer is a person of at least equal standing in the area of expertise to the person being reviewed. The thought is that only peers have the knowledge of the topic of study in question to understand misconceptions or identify errors present, recognize solutions that are breakthroughs or make meaningful contributions towards improvements in clarity or or conclusions.
The way scientists "grade" the work of other scientists is through the peer-review process. This is where colleagues review and comment on the merits of a publication. In the modern academic setting, however, this process has become highly nepotistic and incestuous, where colleagues within a field will promote ideas and publications that support the status quo and collectively reject, and protect against any ideas that might challenge the current paradigm and shift funding. This leads to over-funding of old, stale ideas and a systemic repression of new and interesting ideas in science.
Type your answer here... WHAT IS THE PROCESS BY WHICH SCIENTIST GRADE THE WORK OF OTHER SCIENTISTS BEFORE IT IS PUBLISHED
yes
reviewing
yes
i dont know try ask.com if thats doesnt work go back to 6 grade ugly muts
It's digestion, dude. Am I seriously doing your 9th grade homework for you right now?
The infection is called Bronchitis. I don't get why this wasn't answered before because I'm in fifth grade and I know this stuff.
Bio 9th if you took the regents in the 8th grade.....from there just regular classes, you will figure that out when you get to high school
yes
peer review (:
Peer review
Peer review
It is called peer review.
Peer review
yes
yes
The general term for this is not "grading" but "peer review."
they work in california
yes
This is called "peer review". The editor of a journal will send the manuscript to various experts who critically review it and possibly recommend publication usually with at least some modification suggested.