The gravitational force varies directly as the mass and inversely as the square of the distance.
Mass increases with speed, though significantly only at relativistic speeds. I can't get this to accept math symbols, so I'll spell it out the long way: m = mo /square root of [1 - (v2/c2)] where mo is the rest mass v is velocity c is the speed of light
This is the universal law of gravitation.
F = (m1)x(m2)xG/(d^2)
Grav. force is directly proportional to the product of the 2 masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. F is force, G is the universal grav. constant, m1 mass of 1st object, m2 mass of 2nd, d is distance between their centers.
"Entirely coincidental" is possibly the best description. There is no clear connection between planetary mass and number of satellites:
* Venus is almost the same mass as Earth but has no satellites to Earth's 1. * Mars is half the mass of Earth but has two satellites. * Jupiter has 60 or so; Saturn, significantly less massive than Jupiter, also has about 60. * Uranus has 27 (that we know about); Neptune, which is almost the same mass, has only 13 (again: that we know about). * Pluto (which is no longer considered a planet) has at least three satellites despite being much less massive than Mercury, which has none.
I believe the attracting cohesive force is directly proportional to the product of their mass divided by the sum of the distance between them?
The orbital period is caused by the orbital speed, for instance: Earth's year is consistent of 365 days, but, if we were any slower our orbital period or year will be longer.
i have no clue. i need help on sci. homework.
An acceleration model will be the best to display a relationship between distance and time. This is because it is good to calculate speed and acceleration in meters per second.
inversely proportional
they are inversely related. as the distance increases the magnetic attraction decreases and when the distance decreases the magnetic attraction increases.
The gravitational force varies directly as the mass and inversely as the square of the distance.
um Long-distance relationship?
There is a force of gravity in both directions between every pair of objects, attracting them toward each other. There's no limit on the distance. There is a force of gravity in both directions between the lint in your pocket and the smallest grain of sand on the beach on the far side of the farthest planet orbiting the farthest star in the farthest galaxy from Earth, attracting them toward each other.
scale
The mass of the object, the mass of the object that is attracting it and the distance between their centres of gravity.So your weight on the moon will depend on your mass, the moon's mass and the distance from your centre of gravity to the moon's.The mass of the object, the mass of the object that is attracting it and the distance between their centres of gravity.So your weight on the moon will depend on your mass, the moon's mass and the distance from your centre of gravity to the moon's.The mass of the object, the mass of the object that is attracting it and the distance between their centres of gravity.So your weight on the moon will depend on your mass, the moon's mass and the distance from your centre of gravity to the moon's.The mass of the object, the mass of the object that is attracting it and the distance between their centres of gravity.So your weight on the moon will depend on your mass, the moon's mass and the distance from your centre of gravity to the moon's.
When the distance between the two bodies increases, the gravitational force attracting them decreases.
The relationship between the planet's SPEED and its distance from the Sun is given by Kepler's Third Law.From there, it is fairly easy to derive a relationship between the period of revolution, and the distance.
it is the distance between what an object is orbiting around and the object itself in any given point
Everything
None whatsoever.
my sinep
The scale of a map shows the relationship between the map distance and real world distance. The average scale is one eighty-thousandth of the actual size.
There is no direct relationship between distance and time. Two airplanescan easily cover very different distances in the same amount of time.There can be an indirect relationship, that depends on speed.