Ghosts are not actually the subject of scientific inquiry, although some "ghost-hunters" like to pretend that they are. There are a number of synonyms for ghost, such as a phantom, specter, haunt, etc., but none of these is any more scientific than ghost.
No, there is no scientific proof. No one knows how to truly measure something like a ghost, and so there's no scientific way of knowing if they exist.
There are different forms of ghost hunting, some of which are scientific. For example, I used to do ghost hunting (although now I just research ghosts) for scientific evidence. Or, science is how you investigate a subject matter, not the subject matter itself. Anything can be a science if you approach it scientifically. None of the current TV shows about ghost hunting, however, appear to be very scientific with their approach.
There are no scientific reasons to believe in ghosts, no-one has ever found scientific evidence of ghosts which can only mean they are illusions of the mind.
zooming in
Energy.
ghost
No, there is no scientific proof. No one knows how to truly measure something like a ghost, and so there's no scientific way of knowing if they exist.
The scientific term is 'strata'.
The scientific term for plastics is polymers.
That is precisely the scientific term: "ellipse".
Hyperopia is the scientific term. The common term is far-sightedness.
Ocypode quadrate
The scientific term for mildew is mold(mould)
the scientific term for hearing loss is presbycusis
Check your dictionary - ophthalmologist *is* a scientific term.
yep
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Hepialidae.