41.5 to 42.4
By simply putting the numbers next to one another, smallest = 25 largest = 52 If mathematical functions are permitted, I propose smallest = 2-5! which is approx 7.5*10-37 and largest = 52! which is approx 8.1*1067 But I could be wrong!
29500 to 30499
There is no such number. If any number laid claim to being the smallest rational number its claim could be challenged by half that number - which would also be rational and, obviously smaller. And the claim of that number could be challenged by half that number, and so on.
The smallest number would be 10,000,000 because the one is the lowest number that could possibly go in the ten millions place. After that, you can put all zeros.
2,574
smallest: zero largest: five thousand
You could say -9 or 0 for the smallest, depending on whether you want to include negative numbers or not. 9 would be the largest one digit number.
By simply putting the numbers next to one another, smallest = 25 largest = 52 If mathematical functions are permitted, I propose smallest = 2-5! which is approx 7.5*10-37 and largest = 52! which is approx 8.1*1067 But I could be wrong!
29500 to 30499
16.3 is the largest then 6.43, then 6.33, then 6.25, and finally 6.2 is the smallest. For 6.2 you could also say 6.20.
453,500
New Jersey is the 11th largest.
There is no such number. If any number laid claim to being the smallest rational number its claim could be challenged by half that number - which would also be rational and, obviously smaller. And the claim of that number could be challenged by half that number, and so on.
The smallest number would be 10,000,000 because the one is the lowest number that could possibly go in the ten millions place. After that, you can put all zeros.
2,574
0.095, 0.08, 0.8, 0.73
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.