Want this question answered?
The Arctic is at risk from oil drilling. Take action to protect it
No company is currently (as of May 21, 2009) drilling for oil in Antartica. I base this on a search of the Internet.
Amoxicillin And Clavulanate 250mg With No Prescription in Indianapolis eeafegcagaadfdce
Mica is an additive for drilling fluids.
No. There is no record of any oil company ever causing a tsunami.
It is much harder to drill in the arctic because of the weather, sometimes the parts of an oil rig freeze. In warmer climates you don't have to worry about that. There is less oil in warmer climates.
The Arctic is at risk from oil drilling. Take action to protect it
Pollution from mining and drilling for oil pollutes the air, lakes and rivers
Yes, there are several oil drilling sites currently in the Artic Circle. Several belong to BP.
Yes. Yes, it would. -lots of oil=lots of energy=lots of electricity=lots of comfort -lots of jobs
Shell Oil has recently proven with the economic cost of US$7,000,000,000 (billion) that polar oil exploration is not economically feasible. The proved it in the Arctic. The Antarctic Treaty prohibits commercial enterprises south of 60 degrees S., which includes Antarctica.
Yes
Drilling for natural gas is similar to drilling for oil, but gas must be liquefied before it can be shipped.
the only ban on oil drilling was in 1919
We are drilling for oil in the united states
Obama thinks that drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution.
Antarctica would remain as it is, because drilling for oil violates the Antarctic Treaty, and drilling is prohibited and illegal. As well, drilling north of 60 degrees S, which is legal, would mean that the 'people' would lose vast amounts of money given the depth of the oceans and the proof of failure recently experienced by Shell Oil in Arctic polar waters..