Want this question answered?
I believe she was agreed?
reshiram and zekrom were once one Pokemon but split up because there were two people one half agreed with one person while the other half agreed with the other person
Urban Myth tells us that a mother had a daughter who was very ill and sad. So the mother made a pact with the devil who agreed to make her daughter healthy but she would have no mouth. So the mother made the pact and hello kitty was born because although she was very happy and healthy she had sold her mouth to the devil.
jarvis lorry
She should become his wife.
jean jacque rousseau
Jean Jacques-Rousseau
Jean Jacques-Rousseau
Locke, Harrington, Hobbes, and Rousseau all agreed on the importance of social contracts to establish legitimate political authority and protect individual rights. They also emphasized the natural equality of individuals and the need for consent of the governed in political decision-making.
Locke, Harrington, Hobbes, and Rousseau all believed in social contract theory, which suggests that individuals form governments to secure their rights. They agreed that the legitimacy of government comes from the consent of the governed. Additionally, they all stressed the importance of individual rights and the need for limitations on governmental power to protect these rights.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Locke, Harrington, Hobbes, and Rousseau all likely agreed on the importance of establishing a social contract as the foundation for political authority. They believed that individuals must consent to be governed in order for a just and legitimate government to exist. Additionally, they all emphasized the natural rights of individuals and the need to protect those rights through the structure of government.
he did not go to any school but he does have a college named after him, Francis Marion Univerity Foxws
its either 1. a monarch has absolute power 2. the state of nature is a peaceful and harmonious 3. political authority should be shared by the monarch and representatives of the people 4. citizens have a right to revolt. not sure which one of those 4 though.
Rousseau maintains that the state forms by means of a mutually-agreed-upon social contract. Once all the members of the state enter into that contract, they have to abide by its rules. So if I enter into the social contract with you, but I decide that I want to eat some tomatoes planted in your garden, to pursue my own self-interest, I might go steal your tomatoes. But it's not in the interest of the commonwealth that anyone steal from anyone else--so I'm pursuing my own interest at the expense of the common good (as well as at the expense of yours). I am forced to obey the rules of the commonwealth, because I agreed to the terms when I signed up. Rousseau's notion of personal liberty is not that everyone be free to do what he or she wants, but that everyone be free in the sense of *secure*. So, I, the tomato thief, am "forced" to obey the rules of the commonwealth, which includes not stealing from you. In return, I live in the security provided by that commonwealth, which is the ultimate form of freedom, according to Rousseau. Quoted from Elizabeth
Rousseau maintains that the state forms by means of a mutually-agreed-upon social contract. Once all the members of the state enter into that contract, they have to abide by its rules. So if I enter into the social contract with you, but I decide that I want to eat some tomatoes planted in your garden, to pursue my own self-interest, I might go steal your tomatoes. But it's not in the interest of the commonwealth that anyone steal from anyone else--so I'm pursuing my own interest at the expense of the common good (as well as at the expense of yours). I am forced to obey the rules of the commonwealth, because I agreed to the terms when I signed up. Rousseau's notion of personal liberty is not that everyone be free to do what he or she wants, but that everyone be free in the sense of *secure*. So, I, the tomato thief, am "forced" to obey the rules of the commonwealth, which includes not stealing from you. In return, I live in the security provided by that commonwealth, which is the ultimate form of freedom, according to Rousseau. Quoted from Elizabeth
Rousseau maintains that the state forms by means of a mutually-agreed-upon social contract. Once all the members of the state enter into that contract, they have to abide by its rules. So if I enter into the social contract with you, but I decide that I want to eat some tomatoes planted in your garden, to pursue my own self-interest, I might go steal your tomatoes. But it's not in the interest of the commonwealth that anyone steal from anyone else--so I'm pursuing my own interest at the expense of the common good (as well as at the expense of yours). I am forced to obey the rules of the commonwealth, because I agreed to the terms when I signed up. Rousseau's notion of personal liberty is not that everyone be free to do what he or she wants, but that everyone be free in the sense of *secure*. So, I, the tomato thief, am "forced" to obey the rules of the commonwealth, which includes not stealing from you. In return, I live in the security provided by that commonwealth, which is the ultimate form of freedom, according to Rousseau. Quoted from Elizabeth