In regards to computer processors the higher the number of gigahertz the faster it is.
Yes
A faster processor.
IBM
Of course it is, it is much more faster than the 1.5 GHz processor.
2.5 GHz is better than 2.1 GHz. It is because it is the latest processor. It will be faster than 2.1 GHz.
It's impossible to answer that question. All else being equal, higher is better. However, a six-core 2.8 GHz processor will blow a single-core 3.0 GHz processor out of the water for some applications.
yes it will do even better because a quad processor that is 2.33 ghz means that it has 4 processors and that each one is 2.33 ghz... therefore by doing 4 x 2.33 you get a resulting answer of 9.32 ghz. So yes the quad core processor will run the game and in fact it will run it very well... by the way i have a 2.5 ghz quad core processor. yes it will do even better because a quad processor that is 2.33 ghz means that it has 4 processors and that each one is 2.33 ghz... therefore by doing 4 x 2.33 you get a resulting answer of 9.32 ghz. So yes the quad core processor will run the game and in fact it will run it very well... by the way i have a 2.5 ghz quad core processor.
3.00ghz would be much faster then 1.80ghz, nearly double the computing power.
If the amount of cores it has is the same 2.0 is better. Additional: The above is 100% wrong. A 600Mhz single-core high IPC high bus-width old server processor will outperform a 2.0GHz P4 in all and any tests on the planet. If the 1.8GHz processor isn't an incredibly poorly designed P4, then it is probably actually better than the P4. It takes a very, very high clock frequency to make a P4 contend with anything in today's world.
The Core 2 Duo, by a long shot.
dual core with 2.7 is enough. And you can chooose a better graphics card too. That is better
Is this GHz, Windows Score? Not much information was given. For GHz, It is reasonable, but not very good for gaming, GHz isnt all that makes up a processor though. If it is a windows score, then it is very bad.