A warrant can be witdrawn by the agency that sought it, or a judge can cancel, or "quash" it for sufficient cause.
The officer applying for the warrant must set forth in the application that sufficient 'probable cause' exists that the person named in the warrant was the one that committed the offense. The judge reviewing the warrant application must agree that the 'probable cause' is legally sufficient to support the arrest. When he signs the application it becomes the warrant and is then returned to the officer (or agency) for service.
Don't understand the question. If the authotrities do not have a warrant, then WHAT are they holding you on? If the 'wanting' jurisdiction has teletyped a "hoild" order until a warrant can be issued, that is sufficient to hold you. If it is an 'in-state violation,' mere knowledge that you are wanted is sufficient.
As long as the address, or description, of the property/premises named in the search warrant is legally "sufficient" a name is not necessary.
Yes, it is. If you are referring to the date that the warrant was actually served does not match the date that the judge signed it.... it makes no difference. Often a warrant will be held for a time until law enforcement feels that the time is "just right" to serve it. If the warrant was 'legally sufficient' when the judge signed it, it's still 'legally sufficient' the date it is served.
Question makes no sense. A search warrant is a search warrant regardless of WHERE the premises is physically located.
That's what makes the warrant legal. It signifies that he has read and reviewed the warrant affidavit and found it legal and proper.
Normalcy
In order to obtain a warrant, a police officer / prosecutor must ask a judge to issue the warrant (the application) and submit evidence (usually his own sworn testimony in the form of a written affidavit) that the search/seizure is supported by probable cause.Additional; The "application" for a warrant is called an "affidavit." The statement of probable cause contained in the affidavit MUST satisfy the issuing judge that sufficient probable cause exists to satisfy the law. ONLY after the judge signs the affidavit is a legally sufficient warrant issued.
It depends on the laws in the jurisdiction. In some the issuing of a warrant is sufficient to toll the statute.
Until he has sufficient probable cause to sustain a warrant for an arrest.
Not in the UK.Added: Also the same in the US. Mere knowledge, on the part of the officer(s), that a warrant exists is sufficient cause to place the subject under arrest.