There are three major factors:
Abundance: the rarer the metal is, the more expensive it will be.
Demand: the greater the need or desire the more expensive the metal.
Extraction: the harder a metal is to extract from its ore, the more expensive it is.
#1, it's worth more. Iron is actually useful; iron ore is really only useful for making iron with (other than that, it's just a rock, though hematite can be polished and made into jewelery).
#2, it costs money to turn iron ore into iron. It would be ridiculous to expect the companies that do that to not pass that expense on to their customers (and add a bit of profit for themselves as well).
Almost all metals cost more than iron. Gold, silver and platinum are in the stratospheric league compared with iron.
Because it is rare..:)
Yes , Silver Carbonate can be used to remove iron purities beceause Iron being more reactive than silver replaces silver from silver carbonate . Hence Iron impurities can be removed .
No. Iron is a more reactive metal than silver, so the iron will replace the silver in the silver nitrate solution, forming an iron nitrate solution and solid silver. Eventually, the iron container will be gone, its atoms having gone into the iron nitrate solution.
Use a magnet, iron is magnetic and will stick, while silver won't stick. Silver tends to have more of a shine and will be heavier than iron.
It mostly has to do with the rarity of the two and supply and demand. Silver is significantly more rare than Iron, and thus is more desirable. With less supply to meet the demand, it is more pricey. Also, silver and other precious metals (gold, platinum) are considered more valuable because they are excellent conductors. The technological age calls for more metals with conducting properties for circuit boards and other electronic components. As a result, they are in more demand than the Industrial Era's iron.
silver because sterling silver is 92.5% silver and the purer it is, the more it is worth.
Silver is more dense because silver is around 10.5g/cc, an iron around 7g/cc. silver atomic number 47, where as iron is 26. This means the nucleus will be much heavier, but also take up more space.
Iron is several times more active than silver.
Yes , Silver Carbonate can be used to remove iron purities beceause Iron being more reactive than silver replaces silver from silver carbonate . Hence Iron impurities can be removed .
No. Iron is a more reactive metal than silver, so the iron will replace the silver in the silver nitrate solution, forming an iron nitrate solution and solid silver. Eventually, the iron container will be gone, its atoms having gone into the iron nitrate solution.
no
Use a magnet, iron is magnetic and will stick, while silver won't stick. Silver tends to have more of a shine and will be heavier than iron.
it is more costly to mine because you have to get scuba gear and mining stuff.
It mostly has to do with the rarity of the two and supply and demand. Silver is significantly more rare than Iron, and thus is more desirable. With less supply to meet the demand, it is more pricey. Also, silver and other precious metals (gold, platinum) are considered more valuable because they are excellent conductors. The technological age calls for more metals with conducting properties for circuit boards and other electronic components. As a result, they are in more demand than the Industrial Era's iron.
Silver is slightly more reactive than gold, although they are both very unreactive. Assuming that the gold nitrate exists, because it would be very rare, silver would react with it and displace it. The products formed will be silver nitrate and gold.
yes i think so because if you had a iron bracelet and a sliver bracelet you could easily bend the sliver more then the iron.also you have learned 2 things buy iron bracelet because they don't break as fast and the iron is stronger then sliverhope uv learned somethingpeace outlol
Iron, Gold, and Silver, to name the more common ones.
silver because sterling silver is 92.5% silver and the purer it is, the more it is worth.