BIOLOGISTS USE MICROSCOPE. FOR A DETAILED STUDY THEY USE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE. EVEN OTHER TECHNOLOGIST CAN USE MICROSCOPE. FINE TEXTURES COULD BE OBSERVED UNDER HIGH RESOLUTION MICROSCOPE.
The usual tools used by scientists to see things that are very small, are optical microscopes and electron microscopes.
a microscope
The question refers to "these scientific attitudes". In such circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that tells us what these scientific attitudes are?
You cannot exrete and no bacteria would be in you small intestine and it can be destroyed
to determine a type of bacteria. This question is very vague. I will assume they are doing surgery on something that is infected and to help identify the the bacteria causing the infection, gram stain would be ordered.
A pure culture contains only one bacteria and no other. A sterile culture has only one bacteria in it and is usually used for transport. Contamination is something that doesn't belong. It can even be a small bit of plastic or wire. It is the opposite of a pure culture. The whole idea when working with isolating bacteria is to figure out which bacteria (or microbe) is causing an infection or disease in a patient. Your job is to help to figure this out so that the proper treatment can be started as soon as possible.
"vibrious" would not seem to be a correct term. Are you sure it is not a spelling/printing error of something like "various".
Yes, phytoplankton are so small bacteria would be something a phytoplankton could eat.
Something about bacteria.
3.7*101 Normally a small number like this would not have to be expressed in scientific notation
When a trained scientist makes a careful observation of anything, that qualifies as a scientific observation. Scientific variables would be quantities of something,
A hypothesis is tested in a scientific investigation.
It's not likely that someone would be measuring something in feet that was large enough to warrant the use of scientific notation.
The lack of a scientific basis is one of the DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS of a superstition. If there is a scientific basis for something, it would no longer be fair to call it a superstition.
Just for the exercise it is: 9.488*103 but a small number like this would not normally be expressed in scientific notation
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Apodemus argenteus.
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Cypripedium candidum.
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Ficus benjamina.
Scientific notation is a way to express very large (or very small) numbers. You would represent 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 as 1*1021.