BIOLOGISTS USE MICROSCOPE. FOR A DETAILED STUDY THEY USE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE. EVEN OTHER TECHNOLOGIST CAN USE MICROSCOPE. FINE TEXTURES COULD BE OBSERVED UNDER HIGH RESOLUTION MICROSCOPE.
The question refers to "these scientific attitudes". In such circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that tells us what these scientific attitudes are?
A pure culture contains only one bacteria and no other. A sterile culture has only one bacteria in it and is usually used for transport. Contamination is something that doesn't belong. It can even be a small bit of plastic or wire. It is the opposite of a pure culture. The whole idea when working with isolating bacteria is to figure out which bacteria (or microbe) is causing an infection or disease in a patient. Your job is to help to figure this out so that the proper treatment can be started as soon as possible.
"vibrious" would not seem to be a correct term. Are you sure it is not a spelling/printing error of something like "various".
384401 would be expressed as 3.84401X105 However, we would often simply round this down to two decimal places: 3.84X105 . Scientific notation is a very convenient way to express very large or very small numbers.
Bacteria range in size, but all are microscopic. They cannot be seen by the unaided, naked human eye. They are measured in micrometers; usually a decimal placed answer.... Many are super small
Yes, phytoplankton are so small bacteria would be something a phytoplankton could eat.
Something about bacteria.
A hypothesis is tested in a scientific investigation.
When a trained scientist makes a careful observation of anything, that qualifies as a scientific observation. Scientific variables would be quantities of something,
3.7*101 Normally a small number like this would not have to be expressed in scientific notation
It's not likely that someone would be measuring something in feet that was large enough to warrant the use of scientific notation.
The lack of a scientific basis is one of the DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS of a superstition. If there is a scientific basis for something, it would no longer be fair to call it a superstition.
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Cypripedium candidum.
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Apodemus argenteus.
Just for the exercise it is: 9.488*103 but a small number like this would not normally be expressed in scientific notation
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Ficus benjamina.
Scientific notation is a way to express very large (or very small) numbers. You would represent 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 as 1*1021.