Want this question answered?
This requires a subjective answer, as many historians have pointed out. With that said, one main job of a historian is to search for facts about the topic or area that is being studied. The research for facts should be unbiased. If a bias is intended, then the historian needs to inform the reader of this. For example, a historian wants to write about Marxist interpretations of World War II. In such a publication the historian must say whether he/she is a Marxist or not.
You are the one who should know why you remember it.
historian should have interst in history the should interested to know about our countries past.their favourite subject sholud be history only
We should remember it as the start of the Revolution. It should be remembered as the first battle that was in the Revolution and the colonists won. Remember, at that time, England was the world power!
she was the main god of Athens
Researchers should be cautious about using secondary sources because they may not always be accurate or reliable. Information can be misinterpreted or biased as it passes through multiple sources. Relying solely on secondary sources could lead to misinformation or incomplete understanding of the topic.
Secondary sources may not accurately reflect the current state of the law, as they interpret or analyze primary sources. Relying solely on secondary sources may lead to errors in understanding or misinterpretation of the binding authority. To ensure accuracy and authority in legal citations, it is essential to refer directly to primary sources such as statutes, regulations, or court decisions.
Researchers who use secondary sources must make their best efforts to verify the accuracy of the information. For example, a researcher who cites a newspaper article about a court hearing should dig further to verify the information. To do this they may need to get transcripts of the court hearing. It may not always be easy to verify secondary data in research, but every effort must be made in order to prove the credibility of the sources being used in any research. Researchers must also determine the value of secondary sources at times. If no primary sources are available a researcher must use secondary sources. In order to use credible secondary sources and retrieve honest and accurate information a researcher must validate the sources by evaluating them thoroughly. To evaluate secondary sources a researcher must consider the purpose, scope, authority, and audience that the information is based on (Cooper & Schindler, 2006, Ch. 7). Determining these factors will help a researcher choose secondary sources that have strong value. Secondary data is a source that many researchers will have to use at times. Using secondary data as the only available resource can cause problems of verification and credibility. This makes a researcher's job harder. Although the use of secondary resources can bring extra work, it must be done at times. For a researcher to get past the problems of credibility presented by secondary resources a researcher must take steps to verify secondary sources. A researcher must also make well thought out judgments on secondary resources if they want their research to appear credible and valid. Understanding the problems with secondary research data is the first step in determining how to deal with these problems.
Tom used a magazine article as a secondary source in his report about the US Civil War. A secondary source should describe, discuss, interpret, comment upon, analyze, evaluate, summarize, and process primary sources.
Anything he or she wishes.
When researching information for a biography, you should consider using primary sources such as personal papers, journals, and interviews with the subject or their contemporaries. Secondary sources like biographies, scholarly articles, and documentary films can also provide valuable information. It is important to cross-reference information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy.
Sources should be evaluated for credibility, reliability, accuracy, and relevance to ensure the information is trustworthy and appropriate for the intended purpose. Check the author's credentials, publication date, potential biases, and supporting evidence to determine the credibility of a source.
An archaeologist studies artifacts and physical remains of ancient civilizations to learn about past societies. They use tools such as excavation and analysis to piece together the history of human culture and behavior.
The one that would be the treasurer would be the one that is good with numbers. The historian should enjoy researching the past and a reporter should be interested in finding out the truth.
If possible, you should cite Supreme Court cases directly from the Court's opinion (preferably in US Reports, but many people use online references), not from secondary sources.
they should be mandatory!!!
Yes, many educators do believe that chemistry should be taught is secondary schools now.