What should a scientific test be?

Answer 1

A scientific test for Creation should be fair. There are only 2 choices to explain creation:

_Creation by Evolution

_Special Creation by God.

There are no other real choices, and if one is disproved then it must be the other. It all depends on ideology, but unfortunately some hold to one ideology regardless of facts. It is all a process of elimination:

-scientific facts can be used to prove creation,

but

-evolution cannot be proved by scientific facts

One of the two absolutely basic tenets of Science is that any scientific experiment should be able to be replicated. This means being done again exactly the same way as the first and getting the exact same result. As this would be impossible - it would mean "de-creating" everything first to prove an idelogical theory - it means there can be no scientific proof for Creation.

The second of the two absolutely basic tenets is that Science can only deal with the "here and now", the present time. Science cannot explain where matter for the Big Bang originally came from and what things were like before any 'Big Bang'. Any attempt to do so means Science is dealing with Religous matters.

This means there can be simply no scientific test at allfor creation.

Answer 2

A scientific test should be designed to answer a specific research question or hypothesis using controlled conditions, standardized procedures, and accurate measurements. It should be replicable by others to validate the results and be conducted with appropriate ethical considerations.