The most massive stars; they will use up their fuel much faster than less-massive stars. or even low mass star which is less then half the mass of our sun may able to last more then a trillion years that is longer then the universe age
The large mass stars that are 10 times our Sun's mass.
yes because when a star ages, the star collapses forming new stars which make up more atoms.
Barnard's star is a red dwarf, M-type main sequence star.
Betelgeuse is the massive red giant star at the shoulder of the constellation Orion. The greater the initial mass of a star, the faster it develops, and the faster it ages. Betelgeuse is nearing the end of its "life", and will probably explode in a supernova relatively soon. However, "relatively soon" to an astronomer means "within the next 100,000 years", so it isn't likely to happen tonight - or even within our short human lifetimes.
A Penosladickweed star
Gamma Aquilae (Tarazed) is a star in the constellation Aquila.It has a spectral type of K3 and is a giant orange star.
It can be classified early in its lifecycle and classified as a different type of star as it ages.
it depends on what type of star it is bigger stars run out of fuel hydrogen faster then smaller stars
yes because when a star ages, the star collapses forming new stars which make up more atoms.
The bigger the star, the faster it dies. Super-massive stars like Betelgeuse, the red supergiant at the shoulder of Orion, probably don't exist much longer than a few hundred thousand years. Our Sun will exist for about 9 billion years before it expands into a red giant. Tiny red dwarf stars can exist for tens of billions of years or more.
A morning star
Red giant is a type of star.
What type of star is Nahn
It is shorter because it uses the fuel faster and ends up dying faster.
Barnard's star is a red dwarf, M-type main sequence star.
It is a G-type star.
Draco star type is negative
the star that is large and compact is a g-type sunlike star.