answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Segregation education is inherently unequal.

User Avatar

Rosalee Bergstrom

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

No. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the only published opinion in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. However, when Warren circulated his draft of the opinion in early May, it was met with an enthusiastic response from the Associate Justices.

Justice William O. Douglas immediately wrote a handwritten note: "I do not think I would change a single word in the memoranda you gave me this morning. The two draft opinions meet my idea exactly. You have done a beautiful job."

Justice Harold H. Burton sent a note the day the verdict was announced, "Today I believe has been a great day for America and the Court....I cherish the privilege of sharing in this." In a tribute to Warren's judicial statesmanship, Burton added, "To you goes the credit for the character of the opinions which produced the all important unanimity. Congratulations."

Justice Felix Frankfurter also sent a personal note that day stating, "This is a great day that will live in glory. It is also a great day in the history of the Court..."

You can view copies of the actual notes on the Library of Congress Exhibition site: "Brown v. Board at 50," accessible through Related Links, below.

Case Citation:

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)

The 1954 US Supreme Court verdict in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was unanimous in declaring de jure segregation a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. There was no dissenting opinion.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Brown v. Board of Education is the short citation for Oliver Brown, et al., v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al. (et al. is a Latin abbreviation that means "and others"). The Topeka, Kansas, school district was the defendant in a class action suit filed by 13 adults and their 21 children who fought a Kansas state law allowing communities with a population larger than 15,000 to segregate their schools.

The Brown in the title is Oliver Brown, father of Linda Brown (Thompson), whose story is most often associated with the case.

NAACP Chief Counsel Thurgood Marshall argued Brown before the US Supreme Court in 1952 and 1953; the high court unanimously found in favor of the Plaintiffs (Brown, et al.) in 1954, ruling that segregation in education was a violation of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause. This decision overturned the infamous 1896 Plessy v. Furguson ruling that had declared "separate but equal" facilities constitutional.

Contrary to popular belief, by the time it reached the Supreme Court, the case was not just about Linda Brown or her school district, but was a compilation of five separate cases sharing the name Brown v. Board of Education because they all related to racial segregation.

Case Citation:

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

There were no concurring opinions. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the only published opinion for Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. However, when Warren circulated his draft of the opinion in early May, it was met with an enthusiastic response from the Associate Justices.

Justice William O. Douglas immediately wrote a handwritten note: "I do not think I would change a single word in the memoranda you gave me this morning. The two draft opinions meet my idea exactly. You have done a beautiful job."

Justice Harold H. Burton sent a note the day the verdict was announced, "Today I believe has been a great day for America and the Court....I cherish the privilege of sharing in this." In a tribute to Warren's judicial statesmanship, Burton added, "To you goes the credit for the character of the opinions which produced the all important unanimity. Congratulations."

Justice Felix Frankfurter also sent a personal note that day stating, "This is a great day that will live in glory. It is also a great day in the history of the Court..."

Case Citation:

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

It was that all blacks had a chance to sit down in class and be equal like their white peers. This was crucial in making sure that they would have the same quality of education as everyone else. Since then, the ruling has ensured the equal rights to an education for blacks.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

No. Brown v Board of Education did not have a single dissenting opinion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

Segregation education is inherently unequal.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was there a dissenting opinions in the brown v board case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Should dissenting opinions be included in case briefs?

Dissenting opinions may be cited as persuasive authority, so a relevant dissent should be included if it strengthens your case.


What were the dissenting and majority opinions for the Supreme Court case National Socialist Party of America v Village of Skokie?

porn


Does a dissenting opinion express an opposing viewpoint?

Yes. A dissenting opinion outlines one or more justices' reasoning about why the Supreme Court should have made a different decision. While dissenting opinions do not carry the force of law, they may be cited, and sometimes become a more important part of case law than the majority opinion.


To what did the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education refer?

what did the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education refer?


When a supreme court justice disagree with majority opinion of the court they are?

dissenting.


Which decision by the warren court determined that deprecating children by race in school was unconstitutional?

brown v. board of Which_decision_by_the_Warren_Court_determined_that_separating_children_by_race_in_schools_was_unconstitutional.Ryan


What was decided because of the brown v board case?

Brown Vs. The Board of Education struck down the doctrine of Separate but Equal.


Did Oliver brown win the case against the board of education?

no


What court case established the principle that separate education is inherently unequal?

Brown V. Board of Education


What does dissent in a case mean?

Dissenting means that for one reason or another a judge in an appellate or a justice in a Supreme Court case disagrees with the decision of the majority of the other judges. The justice or justices dissenting will usually write a dissenting opinon to go along with the main court opinion. The dissenting opinion will state reasons why the dissenting justices disagree with the majority decision.


What is Board vs Brown?

Brown vs Board was a landmark US Supreme Court case. In this case the court declared that it is unconstitutional to separate public schools for black and white students. Brown vs Board paved the way to integration and was a major victory for the civil rights movement.


What do one or more justices write when they disagree with the majority?

A Justice may write a dissenting opinion if he or she votes against the majority and wants to record his or her legal reasoning for consideration in future cases. Dissenting opinions, although written in opposition to the majority, or Court Opinion, may be cited as precedents in future litigation. An opinion that agrees with the decision in the case (although not necessarily the reasoning) is called a concurringopinion.For more information on opinions of the Court, see Related Questions, below.