It was supposed to be no more than a court verdict about one slave's application for his freedom.
But it turned out to have big implications, because the court declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. According to their reading of the Constitution, slaves counted as property, so if a man's property was sacred, slavery could not be abolished.
to be free
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
In the Supreme Court.
Slaves were the property of their owners.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
jkjkjki dont know
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
In the Supreme Court.
No