They were not slaves - they were serfs, ie bound to the land. The had some rights, and were entitled to the produce of the land after paying tribute to their owners. And they couldn't be sold. So no, they were not slaves.
These serfs were called Helots
Helots.
250,000 slaves lived in Sparta in 400 B.C.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
Sparta depended on slaves and helots (people from a nearby settlement who were forced to work.
They didn't use money, but their slaves did.
the Helots
Helots.
Slaves or enslaved people in Sparta were called helots.
Assuming you mean `Sparta´, the ancient Greek State, the slaves there were called Helots.
Yes, Sparta relied on a system of slaves called helots who were more numerous than the free citizens; in fact, the helots greatly outnumbered the Spartan citizens. In contrast, Athens also had slaves but fewer in number compared to the free population.
250,000 slaves lived in Sparta in 400 B.C.
horribly, terribly
The Spartans used Helots to till their land. These were, however, not slaves but serfs - that is they were bound to the land and delivered half their produce to Sparta. They were also used in war as light infantry, and the best of them freed from serfdom after good performance.
no
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
well Sparta has slaves but they well are vary cruel and mean to there slaves and Athens gives and has respect