The name of the upper class of hierarchy is:Sumerian. The hierarchy, would be the king and his family, the nobles and their families, the priests and families, and the military leaders and their families.
At the top of the society was the king and his family. The priests were considered near the top as well. The rest of the upper class was made up of the wealthy such as administrators and scribes.
nomads to villages to city-states to empires
it is not a ziggurat, it is an a triangle showing different levels of governence
Order of importance of individuals
Like the Medieval social structure, there were very stark contrasts between the rich and poor in the Songhai Empire. Monarchs were at the top while landless slaves formed the base of the social hierarchy. However, there is one distinct way Songhai differed from Medieval social structure, Songhai religious officials were not considered a separate social class.
greek civilzations
Mesopotamia had 5 social levels. I put them from highest to lowest. Here they are :1.) King2.) Landowners / Priests3.) Commoners4.) Farmers5.) Slaves
Mesopotamian and Egyptian Social StructuresConcerning social structure, the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt had similar general structures, but very different specific structures. The social structures of both Mesopotamia and Egypt consisted of the general, basic features, such as social division and gender dominance, that were either emergent properties of the formation of civilization or common features of civilizations at that time. However, when these features are broken down into more detailed social properties of specific social hierarchy and the degree of male dominance, it becomes apparent that Mesopotamia had both a more distinct hierarchy and a higher degree of male dominance than Egypt.Both Mesopotamia and Egypt had similar general social structures concerning class divisions, general classifying methods, and gender dominance. In both civilizations, class divisions in general were very apparent and significant. Social classes were defined in both Mesopotamia and Egypt by wealth and position. This social division is an inevitable characteristic of civilizations caused by their development during their emergence. Another similarity of the general social structures of Mesopotamia and Egypt is that both civilizations were patriarchies. This characteristic of a male-dominated society is the result of the agriculture revolution, which degraded women because of the decreasing dependency on them and their lack of labor skills needed. Before the agriculture revolution, women's foraging provided most of the food for the community. However, after the agriculture revolution, communities depended almost entirely on labors requiring heavy physical strength. Since men were physically stronger, these labors were usually done by them, leaving women mainly as powerless housewives. These similarities in Mesopotamian and Egyptian social structure characteristics signify their both being civilizations and their similar time periods.
Order of importance of individuals
A hierarchy is the social system in ancient Egypt
Yes, there was a social hierarchy in many historical societies, with various levels of power, influence, and privilege. This hierarchy often placed rulers or nobility at the top, followed by clergy, merchants, artisans, and peasants or laborers at the bottom. Social status was typically inherited and influenced an individual's opportunities and treatment within society.
Hierarchy
Untouchable.
none
Social Hierarchy :-]
In Mesopotamia, they had social classes; they invented them too.
lalalalalallalala
You need to respect the hierarchy.Bees have a very complex social and hierarchy system.According to my family hierarchy, one of my ancestors was a cousin to King Richard the Lionheart.
Like the Medieval social structure, there were very stark contrasts between the rich and poor in the Songhai Empire. Monarchs were at the top while landless slaves formed the base of the social hierarchy. However, there is one distinct way Songhai differed from Medieval social structure, Songhai religious officials were not considered a separate social class.
To institute the pre-revolutionary political and social order.