Want this question answered?
The Han Dynasty had a very similar Social ranking as of the other Dynasties, It starts from the bottom Slaves/Peasants - Marketers - Nobles/Warriors - Emperor
fmkgm'
The social classes in China were divided by economic status. The classes were rulers, nobles, farmers, traders, craftspeople, and slaves.
Political struggles and social problems weakened the Han Dynasty. It fell in A.D. 220. China had no single ruler.
Political struggles and social problems weakened the Han Dynasty. It fell in A.D. 220. China had no single ruler.
I lik E pie
Family relations created pervasive social cohesion in both Rome and Han china since they were used as units for social ranking. The Han Dynasty had a Social ranking similar to other Dynasties. It started with the Slaves or Peasants then to Marketers followed by the Nobles/ Warriors and the top most being the Emperor.
Han social classes were different from most social divisions because they were based on a person's occupation rather than their birth or family background. In Han China, individuals had the opportunity to move up or down in social class based on their skills and abilities. This social mobility allowed for a more dynamic and meritocratic society compared to other systems where social status was determined by birthright.
The three social classes in China under the Zhou dynasty are King, Nobles, and Peasants.
they were the people that would be in the social classes of ancient china
Class structure became more rigid
Because the people in inner china called themselves the Han people after the Han dynasty. The people that live in outer china are not Han people, the do not like Han.