A sandy beach
I assume you refer to the distance between the points.I assume you refer to the distance between the points.I assume you refer to the distance between the points.I assume you refer to the distance between the points.
assume
Yes, they do exist. I assume that was the question!
id assume there are 6!
25%25%i assume you mean percent25%
have, not has, and I would assume that it has electrons to be electromagnetic radiation, and therefore mass
I assume you mean heat transfer. The answer is radiation.
You should always assume maritime law is in effect on any body of water.
Too much radiation I would assume.
Based upon the agricultural uses of the Niger river and the fact that it is home to more than 250 species of freshwater fish and other freshwater dwelling animals like hippopotamus' and other wildlife it is safe to assume that the river is freshwater rather than salt water.
Since she lives in a gigantic lake, I would assume that her diet consists of fish and freshwater plants
(Note: the original question had "moon"; I assume that was a typo.) Cherenkov radiation.
That's a a pretty vague question, but I assume it is what type of animal is the yabby? Yabbies are actually a small type of freshwater crayfish, of which several different species occur.
By invisible i assume you mean that the object does not emit electromagnetic radiation. In which case your answer is dark matter. Or potentially black holes (if you ignore the possibility of Hawking radiation).
I assume you mean what part of the world. The answer to that question is that puffer fish live all over the world, from pacific to south Atlantic to freshwater rivers and lakes.
Simple answer, no one knows. Regulatory authorities assume that radiation doses follow a linear plot based on cases of high dose exposure alone, and do extrapolate down to zero, because there is little to no information of effects of low doses, and they have to assume something (they cannot simply ignore low doses, so they assume the worst). Currently, all knowledge of radiation and it's effects comes from relatively high doses, i.e. from accidents like Chernobyl, since you can't actually experiment to see what happens, and low dose effects are very long term and any conditions the do later develop cannot be specifically assigned to low dose radiation exposure conclusively. However, there is some study on a principle called radiation hormesis that suggests that low doses in addition to the natural background are actually beneficial.
Animals, by which I assume you mean warmblooded mammals mainly, will suffer similar biological damage as humans through ionising radiation.