answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A primary source would be a picture from that time. Or something like a diary. I think Davey Crockett had a diary of what happened.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would be a primary source from the Battle of the Alamo?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What is a primary source of information about the war of 1812?

The actual battle plan for the attack on Fort McHenry would be an example of a primary source. The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and the British Empire.


What was the name of the battle that occurred 2 weeks after the Alamo?

That would be the Battle of Coleto.


What is difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary source and from a secondary source?

A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.


Why did men cry Remember the Alamo?

they cryed that because they where celebrating their victory of the Alamo victory. they would scream it in the beginning and the end of the battle.


How did the Battle of the Alamo affect the fight for Texas independence?

It showed them how hard they would have to fight for their freedom from Mexico.

Related questions

What is the difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary sources and from a secondary source?

A primary source would be from someone who was actually at the battle, while a secondary source would be from someone who had heard about the battle or wrote about it, but wasn't actually at the battle.


Would you consider the Bayeux Tapestry a primary source or a secondary source?

Are you talking about the tapestry itself as a textile, or are you talking about information portrayed on the tapestry?


What is a primary source of information about the war of 1812?

The actual battle plan for the attack on Fort McHenry would be an example of a primary source. The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and the British Empire.


What was the battle most responsible for winning Texas its freedom?

I would think that it would be the Battle of the Alamo


What was the name of the battle that occurred 2 weeks after the Alamo?

That would be the Battle of Coleto.


Is a picture off Google pictures a primary or secondary source?

It depends what the picture is. If it's a picture of a painting in which the artist was there when whatever it was happened (example: a painting of the Battle of Yorktown in which the artist was there) it would be a primary source. If it was a picture where the person wasn't there (example: someone dressed up as George Washington) it would be a secondary source.


What is the difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary source and a secondary source?

A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.


What is difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary source and from a secondary source?

A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.


Why did men cry Remember the Alamo?

they cryed that because they where celebrating their victory of the Alamo victory. they would scream it in the beginning and the end of the battle.


Is a survey a primary source?

Yes, The data collected in a survey is a primary source, and conclusions based on that data would be a secondary source.


Where can one find a job hire for the Alamo car company in the USA?

The single best place to look for jobs with Alamo is with Alamo. Outside sources would include Indeed and Monster, as they are big job source sites. Yelp is also another good source for information.


Who is a primary source?

With regard to history, a primary source would be considered as such if they were eye witnesses to an event, such as the Siege of Jereusalem.