people
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoNothing is wrong; but plutonium is very toxic, radioactive - dangerous.
Exactly what part about it is wrong? The mass-energy equivalence is widely accepted in modern physics. What is wrong is the popular explanation that "mass is converted to energy" in a nuclear reaction. In fact, both mass and energy are conserved in this case.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
It might be nuclear energy, but I could be wrong.
Nothing is wrong; but plutonium is very toxic, radioactive - dangerous.
Exactly what part about it is wrong? The mass-energy equivalence is widely accepted in modern physics. What is wrong is the popular explanation that "mass is converted to energy" in a nuclear reaction. In fact, both mass and energy are conserved in this case.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Nuclear energy
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
The energy released is nuclear energy.
It is often stated that mass is transformed to energy. This is wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved in a chemical reaction - or in a nuclear reaction. The Wikipedia article on "binding energy" clarifies this.
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.
Nuclear energy and renewable energy are not related. Renewable energy does not use nuclear energy.