State law can be more detailed than federal law, but cannot conflict with federal law. Therefore, a state law cannot determine that a federal law is invalid. The state would have to, instead challenge the federal law as an unconstitutional intrusion on state rights.
The Supremacy Clause. Someone else said: Preemption Clause of the Constitution makes the federal law trump state law but it does not necessarily render the state law invalid unless following state law would violate the federal law.
Nullification
supremacy clause
If a state law is in conflict with a national law, a state judge must uphold the national law, as the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law. This means that the state law is invalid to the extent of the conflict. The judge may rule the state law unconstitutional or unenforceable in that specific instance. Ultimately, the judge's duty is to ensure compliance with federal law.
In the case of a conflict between state law in Rhode Island and federal law, the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution dictates that federal law takes precedence. This means that if a state law contradicts federal law, the federal law will prevail, and the state law may be deemed invalid. However, states can sometimes implement laws that are more restrictive than federal regulations, as long as they do not directly conflict. Ultimately, legal challenges may arise, and courts would resolve any disputes regarding the validity of the conflicting laws.
No, federal law and state law are not the same. Federal law applies to the entire country, while state law only applies within the boundaries of a specific state.
Federal law takes precedence over state law.
A state law is created by the state and only pertains to that single state. A federal law is created by the national government and is enforced throughout the whole nation. Federal law overrides state law.
federal law preempts state regulations when a federal law regulates that particular subject.
Federal. The dual government is set up in such a way that if federal and state are in conflict, federal trumps. The order is as follows: Federal constitution Federal statute Federal case law Federal regulations and administrative law State constitution State statute State case law State regulations and administrative law
No, federal law supersedes state constitutions.
State law cannot contradict federal law because the Constitution states that federal law has power over state law.