A biologist would likely only study physical things in regards to how they affect living things.
Because the sky doesn't reproduce copies of itself through DNA.
When trying to come up with characteristics of nonliving things, it helps to think about what makes them different from living things. Unlike living organisms, nonliving things do not need water to survive, nor do they have reproductive or respiratory systems. In addition, nonliving things do not need nutrition in order to exist.
The same kind of nonliving things you'd find in a forest: rocks, dirt, sand, water, decayed biological matter (e.g. insect husks and leaf litter), etc.
Technically there is not such thing as a non-living cell, because all cells are living, though it might just mean a cell that has died.
a nigggerteen
sociologist i think!
to tell you the truth i do not know but think of this does a folder have a beating heart or is it just cardboard
All scientist study science so every one you could think of :)
Biologists study life; they can be considered to be of two kinds: zoologists study animals, and botanists study plants.
Marine biologist's study everything from algae to the largest whale. Basically anything in the ocean, living or not they will study.
so that it is easier to study the selected species
Because the sky doesn't reproduce copies of itself through DNA.
Oxygen was the missing thing was.
When trying to come up with characteristics of nonliving things, it helps to think about what makes them different from living things. Unlike living organisms, nonliving things do not need water to survive, nor do they have reproductive or respiratory systems. In addition, nonliving things do not need nutrition in order to exist.
i think the ducks went to a scientist house and the scientist ask the duck '' do you wanna help me do a experiment with me or for me?
no..nevore..because he is a scientist not student...hekhek.. jwk...i think maybe..
i think that theywould use the lab