Any sentence that has a coordinating conjunction that joins together two independent clauses needs a comma with the coordinating conjunction. Independent clauses can stand alone as a complete sentence.
When you combine two independent clauses, you need to separate them with a semicolon--not a comma. If you use a comma instead of a semicolon, the result is called a comma splice.
semicolon, comma, colon...
1: a comma and a conjunction 2: a semicolon 3: a semicolon and a conjunctive adverb or transition
All of the above
Depending on the circumstances you could substitute a comma, a semicolon, or end the sentence with a period and start a new sentence.
When you combine two independent clauses, you need to separate them with a semicolon--not a comma. If you use a comma instead of a semicolon, the result is called a comma splice.
Yes, if you're listing you would normally use a semi-colon, but the use of a comma is optional!!
No, a semicolon is not typically used before "except" in a sentence. Instead, a comma may be used to separate clauses or phrases when necessary.
semicolon, comma, colon...
Commas join two clauses where at least one of the clauses is dependent and doesn't make a complete sentence on its own. If both clauses could each make their own sentence if alone, a semicolon is used instead.
In an example like this... I like dogs; nevertheless, I adopted one today.
Yes, that is one of the most common uses of a semicolon. If there is a conjunction joining the clauses, however, you should use a comma instead of a semicolon.
add a comma after the semicolon.
No, a semicolon is not necessary in a compound sentence if a coordinating conjunction is not used. You can use a comma to separate the independent clauses in a compound sentence instead.
add a comma after the semicolon.
A semicolon looks much like a colon, but instead of having two periods, one floating and one below, a comma resides below the period. A semicolon- ;
no