Miranda Cosgrove is 5' 5 ½" (1.66 m) (168 cm)
Miranda Kerr's birth name is Miranda May Kerr.
Miranda July's birth name is Miranda Jennifer Grossinger.
Miranda Doerfler is 5' 1".
Miranda Leonhardt's birth name is Miranda Toma.
The Miranda doctrine (and "Miranda warning") originate from Miranda v. Arizona in 1966. The US Supreme Court overturned Ernesto Miranda's conviction for rape and kidnapping based on its ruling that a suspect must be informed of his right to remain silent and right to have an attorney present before any statements he makes in police interrogation can be admissible in court. Because of this ruling, the police throughout the US now administer the "Miranda warning' ("you have the right to remain silent", etc.) immediately upon arresting a suspect to ensure he or she is aware of these rights.
The supreme's court overturned Miranda conviction in a 5 to 4 decision.
No, it is not. It is the past tense and past participle of the transitive or intransitive verb (to overturn) and can be used as an adjective (e.g. an overturned ruling, an overturned vehicle).
Yes, in the 70's. The ruling was later overturned.
Yes; if you are in police custody, then it applies.
Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged with rape in 1963. The case bearing his name, which overturned his conviction, was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. Miranda was retried on evidence that didn't include his confession, and convicted again.
McCulloch v. Maryland
A law that violates the Constitution must be overturned
There is only one warning that covers Miranda. Although different departments may have SLIGHTLY different wording, they all must cover ALL the aspects of the Supreme Court Ruling.
adg
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Not really, although many courts have fleshed in the law about some of the nuances that were not resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court's original Miranda opinion.UpdateThe Miranda ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for Berghuis v. Thompkins,08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must invoke his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than waive it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
If one is not read his Miranda rights (the right to remain silent, and the right to speak to an attorney), anything that he says that is self-incriminating cannot be used in court as evidence.This means that officials can still interrogate and act upon any information gleaned, but that information cannot be used in court.These "Miranda rights" stem from a 1966 US Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. Arizona, in which Ernesto Miranda's conviction was overturned because he was not informed of his Constitutional right to remain silent and consult with a lawyer.