in aprox 2.5 billion years due to the solidification of earth molten core, unlike mars who's core has already solidifyed resulting in the dead planet we see today
No. Oklahoma is in an area that has been largely geologically inactive for hundreds of billions of years.
4 billion years
Tasmania is geologically inactive. There are no volcanoes.
Then, Earth would have been geologically dead.
No, since it has no surface, it has no geology.
No. Oklahoma is in an area that has been largely geologically inactive for hundreds of billions of years.
4 billion years
about 2.5 billion years but most people say five
Geologically speaking, no. But in human terms, some previously abundant minerals could become scarce.
Tasmania is geologically inactive. There are no volcanoes.
Then, Earth would have been geologically dead.
No, since it has no surface, it has no geology.
The Earth is geologically active due to the convection of heat from the planet's interior.
a) Slowly, b) fictitiously.
The term used to refer to an inactive volcano is "dormant".The other term to call an inactive volcano is "extinct volcano". But as the years pass by some of the extinct volcanoes may become active depending on the earth's core condition.
Earth is geologically active and has wind and water to erode craters. The moon is geologically dead and has no atmosphere and thus no erosion. There is nothing on the moon to destroy impact craters.
No. Smaller planets become geologically dead sooner. A larger planet has a larger volume and thus a larger heat reservoir than a smaller planet and so can remain geologically active for longer.