answersLogoWhite

0

To evaluate the differing arguments about the origins of World War II presented in the two books, it would be most useful to examine the authors' credentials and perspectives, as well as the sources they utilize to support their claims. Analyzing the historical context and biases inherent in each book can provide insight into the validity of their arguments. Additionally, comparing the arguments with established historical facts and consensus can help clarify which points are more substantiated. Engaging with scholarly critiques and other historical analyses can also enhance the evaluation process.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Suppose you've read two different books on World War and has different arguments about how the worst started which of the following sources provides the best support for the author's arguments [APEX]?

A set of diary entries written by generals who planned strategies during World War II [APEX]


Is freestyle BMX an invention?

Actually, there are many arguments discussing this. I suppose it is made from people who found out about it.


What is a command argument?

Command line arguments are provided at the time of running the program. Example: Suppose that your program needs input name and its value then running it from commandline(DOS prompt) you provide the values after the program name java xyz name JAX(name is name and value is jax)


Suppose you have read two different books on World War 2 and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Which of the following best describes the stronger historical argument?

The stronger historical argument would typically be the one that is supported by a more comprehensive analysis of primary sources, considers a wider range of perspectives, and effectively addresses counterarguments. It should also integrate established historical facts while providing a coherent narrative that explains the complex interplay of political, economic, and social factors leading to the war's outbreak. Ultimately, the strength of the argument hinges on its evidential support and analytical depth rather than simply differing viewpoints.


Is suppose a verb?

Yes, the word 'suppose' is a verb. It means to assume something for the sake of an argument or theory. An example sentence: I suppose you want me to leave.


What were Dr.Suess's parents jobs?

well, theodors father was a brew master if im corectly evaluating this, little tipsy i suppose


How do you convince your parents to let you go vegan?

Veganism isn't a completely balanced diet. It tends to often lack in protein, and certain vitamins. Most people who go vegan with their diet, do so for health reasons. I suppose you would have to find the proper winning argument.


Is it possible to love forever?

Well nobody knows because you don't know if you are meant for each other if you have had a Lot of arguments or slit up thenNO! But if you are good together then i suppose you are meant to be.


Suppose your at a store and you see something you would really like you know your spouse will be very angry it and dont want to get into an argument in this situation youre experiencing conflict?

approach-advoidance


Who have the most hurtful kick Tajri or Shawn Michael?

I suppose it could be different opinions for different people.


Suppose the framers had set uup a direct democracy.how might our history have been different?

it wont be different


Suppose you are troubleshooting a problem at the data-link layer You are at the stage of evaluating and documenting the changes you are making and realize that the problem is intermittent?

You need to wait to see if the problem occurs again before you can evaluate the effect of your changes