No revolution along the lines Marx foresaw has occurred. He advocated a revolution that would result in the abolition of the wages system.
Russia's economic backwardness was definitely a key cause, but other key factors included the political situation of the Tsar's oppressive autocratic rule, the terrible living conditions for the peasantry and proletariat (working class), the loss of the Russo-Japanese war, and Bloody Sunday (the catalyst that tipped Russia into revolution.)
sabtbir knows u bloody idiot
Bloody hell! I am not a teacher
leave this bloody question do some thing else .
sabtbir knows u bloody idiot
No revolution along the lines Marx foresaw has occurred. He advocated a revolution that would result in the abolition of the wages system.
Absolutely bloody and violent. As said by Schama, violence was the motor that kept the revolution going.
the french revolution was a rebellion of the french against their king. it was a bloody and violent batttle/rebellion
Both existed for about 10 years, both had changes of government and both were violent and often bloody.
yes.
It shows how bloody and violent it was and is today
Yes, but it is not too violent.
Because of bloody revolution of anarchists and murderers who did that revolution.
Because of bloody revolution of anarchists and murderers who did that revolution.
It was also known as the Bolshevik Revolution.
The killings on Bloody Sunday
Bloody Sunday is the name commonly given to the January 9, 1905 incident that is sometines referred to as a revolution.