0
What else can I help you with?
What A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?
For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
A scientist who studies the fossil record of human evolution is an?
paleoanthropologist. They analyze fossils, artifacts, and other evidence to understand the origins and evolution of hominids and human ancestors.
What is the Best Evidence to disprove Evolution?
There is no single piece of evidence that definitively disproves evolution. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Any challenges to the theory of evolution would need to provide substantial evidence and be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
What scientist first described evolution as a process of adaptation?
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, a French scientist, was one of the first to propose a comprehensive theory of evolution in the early 19th century. He suggested that organisms can adapt to their environment through the inheritance of acquired characteristics.
What A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?
For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
A scientist who studies the fossil record of human evolution is an?
paleoanthropologist. They analyze fossils, artifacts, and other evidence to understand the origins and evolution of hominids and human ancestors.
What is fossil evidence?
fossil evidence is when scientist study fossils to figure out how the animal died how it evoled
What evidence of common anserty and diversity realets to human evolution?
Fossils If they look alike
What theory did the scientist provide evidence for?
The scientist provided evidence for the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was proposed by Charles Darwin. Through observations of different species and their adaptations to their environments, the scientist showed how species can change over time to better suit their surroundings through the process of natural selection.
What scientist stated evolution?
Darwin
Homology is evidence of what?
Evolution
What is the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to what evidence?
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
How are vertebrate embryos evidence of evolution?
All vertebrate embryos look roughly the same, showing that they come from a common ancestor.
What are facts that prove that both creationism and evolution are both right?
Creationism is religious dogma. Nothing proves its correctness. As any scientist with a dictionary would tell you, nothing proves evolution either. But there is a heck of a lot of evidence and testing that suggests it is about as right as we can get.
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to evidence?
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
Is Copernicus related to evolution?
Copernicus is a famous scientist. He is not related to evolution. Evolution is the gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex form. Copernicus is a human scientist. These two are not related.
